Connect with us


Trump Vindicated! Comedian Attacks Sarah Sanders Skin Color And Gender In Most Disgusting Way

Trump wins again…



At last night’s White House Correspondents Dinner the so-called “comedian” Michelle Wolfe wasted no time whatsoever in not only “roasting” the current administration, but also doing something that was more akin to a vocal lynching.

At one point in the awful hate-filled speech, Wolke turned her attention to White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders by saying that she was never quite certain what to call her, “Is it Sarah Sanders, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, Cousin Huckabee, Auntie Huckabee Sanders? What’s ‘Uncle Tom,’ but for white women who disappoint other white women?”

David Martosko, the political editor for Daily Mail US, pointed out that Trump was right not to attend the event because of the vitriol.

Trending: Elected Democrat Official Who Viciously Attacked Veteran Just Learned Her Fate

Here were some of the highlights of the dinner:

Wolf’s first offensive remark referred to Trump’s absence at the event. “I would drag him here myself, but it turns out that the President of the United States is the one pussy you’re not allowed to grab.”

Then the so-called comedian went after Sarah Huckabee Sanders, “I loved you as Aunt Lydia in ‘A Handmaid’s Tale.’”

Of course, she couldn’t stop short of attacking VP Pence neither, “He thinks abortion is murder. Which first of all don’t know it till you try it. And when you do try it, really knock it. You gotta get that baby out of there.”

And last but not least, what liberal media function is complete without attacking the President’s daughter who happens to be Jewish, “Ivanka, she was supposed to be an advocate for women, but she’s about as helpful to women as an empty box of tampons.”

It’s still early so we don’t know how each person will react to these hate-filled cracks against the President, family, and staff, but Sarah Huckabee Sanders who’s never at a loss for words was quick to post a comment on her Facebook page.

“I don’t think I can fall asleep tonight until I say a few things publicly. First, I’m so grateful for all of the support people are showing me after the White House Correspondents’ Dinner this evening. Second, Michelle Wolf thought it was funny comparing me to Aunt Lydia from the Handmaid’s Tale, but I’m proud to be associated with that hard-working and fearless woman. In fact, I think I’m going to ask friends to call me Aunt Lydia from now on! Good night and God bless.”

Whatever the left throws at her Sarah is always standing tall. She is tougher than any MMA fighter ever and she is a blessing to our nation. Thank you, Sarah!

Here is more on this outrageous display of disrespect and bullying by Wolfe via Indie Wire:

“If anyone was tuning in to this year’s White House Correspondents’ Dinner for some simple jokes about the President, they got a lot more than they bargained for.

Michelle Wolf started off her hosting gig by fast-forwarding through the kinds of jokes that usually pepper a White House Correspondents’ Dinner set, even skipping over the customary C-SPAN nod that the channel itself even highlighted earlier in the day.

Instead, the rest of her jokes, delivered to the gathered crowd at the Washington Hilton Hotel in Washington, DC, played no favorites and left no one exempt. Even after the White House Correspondents’ Association went out of its way to thank Trump Administration officials for attending, Wolf wasted no time going after former and current officials both in the room and elsewhere.

The jabs ranged from the tame (“Mike Pence is the kind of guy who brushes his teeth and drinks orange juice and thinks, ‘Mmmmm…’”) to the scathing, including a barrage against the White House’s representative on the dais, Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders (“I love you as Aunt Lydia on ‘The Handmaid’s Tale’”). It was hard not to watch that salvo against someone sitting at arm’s length away and not think of Stephen Colbert’s infamous 2006 performance, which deflated the room in a similar way. (Sitting next to Sanders, ABC News’ Jonathan Karl looked decidedly unamused.)

Maybe by design, not all of Wolf’s jokes went over well with the audience. A “Match Game”-style call and response section separated the willing participants from the visibly annoyed. A joke about wanting Kellyanne Conway trapped under a tree seemed to make more than a few in the audience nervous. And specific jabs at Fox News, CNN, and MSNBC didn’t leave quite the same soft-punch-in-the-shoulder feeling the usual gags have in the past.

Not all the jokes with an unexpected aim were as piercing as those directed at Conway, Sanders, or Mika Brzezinski and Joe Scarborough (“It’s like when a MeToo works out”). When cycling through jokes intended for the colleagues of people in the room, Wolf said, “Watching Rachel Maddow is like going to Target: You went in for milk and you came out with shampoo, candles, and the entire history of the Byzantine Empire.”

It’s the second consecutive year that the President has chosen not to attend the event, but like Hasan Minhaj did last year, Wolf had her share of Trump material to make up for it. But like her closing statement that “Flint still doesn’t have clean water,” her approach was more to say things that a WHCD host isn’t usually expected to say.

“People call Trump names all the time, and look I could call Trump a racist or misogynist or xenophobic or unstable or incompetent or impotent, but he’s heard all of those and he doesn’t care,” Wolf said in her setup for the “How broke is he?” section.

On a Democrat’s chances in the upcoming 2018 midterms: “You’re somehow going to lose by 12 points to a guy named Jeff Pedophile Nazi Doctor.”

The undercurrents of support for the political/cable-news press that went through Minhaj’s monologue at last year’s event were largely absent this year, especially when Wolf finished off her closing remarks.

“You helped create this monster and now you’re profiting off of him. And if you’re gonna profit off of Trump, you should at least give him some money because he doesn’t have any,” Wolf said.

In contrast to last year’s opening, which used archival footage to highlight the history of tumultuous presidential/press corps relationships, the 2018 version looked to some help from the inside baseball of a WHCD-specific “Our Cartoon President” segment and a painfully awkward intro from outgoing House Speaker Paul Ryan.

White House Correspondents’ Association President Margaret Telav, who appeared in the opening animated video, opened the evening by saluting student journalists and assembled press corps members. Before the events of the evening, she also called for a moment of silence to recognize journalists who had passed in the year previous and to honor Austin Tice, a freelance reporter still held captive in Syria.

Speaking to the stated purpose of the event, Talev addressed the ongoing remarks by the person whose notable absence continued to hang over the ballroom.

“We reject efforts by anyone, especially our elected leaders, to paint journalism as un-American. To undermine the trust between reporter and reader, or to cast doubt on the relevance of facts or truth in the modern age. An attack on any journalist is an attack on us all,” Talev said.”

Join the conversation

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.


Dem Candidate Pushing ‘Irresponsible Breeder’ Tax On Certain Parents Because Of ‘Privilege’



Scott Wallace is a multimillionaire running in Pennsylvania’s 1st Congressional District against current incumbent Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (PA-R). Considered an elite, even amongst the wealthy, he boasts a net worth of between $127 million and $309 million, according to his financial disclosure statement. This would make him the third-richest member of Congress if he were elected to the House today.

From a hardline leftist pedigree, his grandfather was Henry Wallace, the “New Deal visionary” and one-time vice president under former President Franklin D. Roosevelt. His wealth is inherited, stemming from a seed company his grandfather founded that was purchased by DuPont for $10 billion in the 1990s, along with a large number of stocks with the largest being DowDuPont.

His campaign is largely self funded with Wallace claiming he is “putting a significant amount of my own assets into this because this is the most important thing I can imagine doing for America at this point in my life — this is a very expensive district to run in, but it is crucial in the Democrats’ efforts to retake the House.”

But just why this is so incredibly important to Wallace goes beyond the typical party lines of Republican and Democrat. Receiving endorsements from both Planned Parenthood and the National Organization for Women (NOW), Wallace is a population control zealot who believes families who choose to have more than two children are “irresponsible breeders” and should be taxed. Wallace has donated nearly $7 million dollars to various population control groups over the past 20 years, with the majority going through his own Wallace Global Fund.  In addition to its efforts towards population control, the foundation has also reportedly donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to anti-Israel groups that support a boycott of the Jewish State.

Fox News reports:

“Zero Population Growth (ZPG) was among the organizations that received the money from the fund. According to public records, it received $420,000 between 1997 and 2003.

The group, shortly after being founded in 1968, released a brochure advocating abortion to stabilize population growth and claimed that “no responsible family should have more than two children.” To deal with larger families, it also called for families to be “taxed to the hilt” for “irresponsible breeding.”

It also blamed the overpopulation on the ‘white middle-class’ that ‘use up more than their share of resources and do more than their share of polluting‘ and urged them to ‘voluntarily limit their families to two children.’

Paul Ehrlich, who co-founded the ZPG, once called abortion “a highly effective weapon in the armory of population control.” The goal of the organization, which changed its name to Population Connection in 2002, has remained the same since its inception, arguing that the world needs to contain population growth with particular emphasis on American families.

The organization’s political arm, Population Connection Action Fund, publicly endorsed Wallace for Congress, saying his support for their cause is “exactly the kind of dedication we need in Congress.”

Wallace’s fund also gave $20,000 in 2010 to the Center for the Advancement of the Steady State Economy (CASSE), a group that sees the economic growth as undesirable and instead supports an economy with ‘stable or mildly fluctuating levels’ and a society where birth rates equal death rates.

The organization openly supports zero population growth and its executive board member, Herman Daly, advocated issuing reproduction licenses, allowing women to have only two children unless they buy the license for more children from other women. Daly called it the ‘best plan yet offered’ to limit population growth.”

The group advocates strongly for abortion and along with taxing families “to the hilt” for having more than two children, as noted in a Yale Law School publication about the “voices that shaped the abortion debate before the Roe v. Wade Supreme Court’s ruling.”

The group advocates that –

  1. That no responsible family should have more than two children. Any family wanting to care for more than two children should adopt further children. Adopting children does not increase the population.
  2. All methods of birth control, including legalized abortion, should be freely available—and at no cost in poverty cases.
  3. Irresponsible people who have more than two children should be taxed to the hilt for the privilege of irresponsible breeding.

Fox News continued:

Zoe Wilson-Meyer, communications director for Wallace’s campaign, didn’t answer Fox News’ questions on whether Wallace still supports the ideas expressed by the groups.

“The Wallace Global Fund has for decades been a leader in helping women gain access to family planning. Former Co-Chair Scott Wallace is proud of the work of grantees like Planned Parenthood in empowering women and protecting reproductive rights and will stand up for Pennsylvania women,” she said in an email.

“In Washington, Brian Fitzpatrick voted to defund Planned Parenthood and supports Donald Trump’s effort to take away a woman’s right to choose,” she added.

Largely reminiscent of Nazi Germany who exercised eugenics to its full and most horrific potential, this policy of so-called “irresponsible breeders” also resembles the one-child policy from China that saw forced abortions or other forced invasive birth control procedures. Yet eugenics practices had their roots in America as well. American newspapers frequently offered praise for eugenics just prior to WWII and The Holocaust …. that is until Adolf Hitler revealed the true horrors of what eugenics really looked like. They avoided the subject for decades thereafter.

Nine out of ten eugenicists in the 20th Century were also Progressives or Socialists, and the most central component to the eugenic creed is the desire to engineer and centrally plan human reproduction, weeding out the unwanted or undesirable, according to a report on eugenics by PBS.

Yet where does that end? Who determines who is undesirable? Is it the unborn child conceived at an inconvenient time? The elderly mother? The child with cerebral palsy? Those with PTSD? Autism? Blue eyes? White skin? You cannot get to genocide without first visiting identity politics and they say the propagandist’s job is to effectively make the people forget his “enemy” is, in fact, a human being just as he is. It seems we never really do learn from history, do we?

Continue Reading


Trump Issued Major Warning: ‘We Will Look Into Discriminatory and Illegal Practice’ – It’s On!

Huge problems and everyone needs to know!



President Donald Trump voiced his concerns over “discriminatory and illegal practice” when he posted about the alleged controversy going on with Republicans being censored on Twitter. The tactic is sometimes referred to as “shadow banning” and it seems to be a strategy that social media platforms use to limit the visibility of some people. For example, ever wonder why someone who is genuinely popular might have tons of followers but their posts don’t seem to get many responses? It could be one of several reasons. Either they have fake followers, the post is no good, or they are being censored. In many cases, it’s a form of censorship that’s the obvious result. When a social media user goes from getting a lot of replies and views on their posts, then all of a sudden there’s very little replies and it seems like no one has seen the post – then they were hit with that form of censorship or suppression.

Social media platforms such as Twitter and Facebook have been called out for suppressing the content of certain Republican voices or those who support President Donald Trump. Well-known stars like Diamond and Silk have made it very public that they feel targeted for the views and opinions on their pages. That’s just the tip of the iceberg because the problem spans from targeting well-known mainstream people all the way down to the independent publishers. Censorship like this is affecting people’s careers and causing an unbalanced platform in which people with certain views are being limited. It might not be listed as a “ban” but it’s certainly limiting the viewership of certain people. The content that would once appear in people’s feed or timeline now requires a fine-tooth comb to find and it seems like people are realizing this more often and being upset with it.

Trump spoke about it on Twitter and Vice News completed a report on it.

Vice News reported: “Twitter is limiting the visibility of prominent Republicans in search results — a technique known as “shadow banning” — in what it says is a side effect of its attempts to improve the quality of discourse on the platform.

The Republican Party chair Ronna McDaniel, several conservative Republican congressmen, and Donald Trump Jr.’s spokesman no longer appear in the auto-populated drop-down search box on Twitter, VICE News has learned. It’s a shift that diminishes their reach on the platform — and it’s the same one being deployed against prominent racists to limit their visibility. The profiles continue to appear when conducting a full search, but not in the more convenient and visible drop-down bar. (The accounts appear to also populate if you already follow the person.)

Democrats are not being “shadow banned” in the same way, according to a VICE News review. McDaniel’s counterpart, Democratic Party chair Tom Perez, and liberal members of Congress — including Reps. Maxine Waters, Joe Kennedy III, Keith Ellison, and Mark Pocan — all continue to appear in drop-down search results. Not a single member of the 78-person Progressive Caucus faces the same situation in Twitter’s search.

“The notion that social media companies would suppress certain political points of view should concern every American,” McDaniel told VICE News in a statement. “Twitter owes the public answers to what’s really going on.”

Presented with screenshots of the searches, a Twitter spokesperson told VICE News: “We are aware that some accounts are not automatically populating in our search box and shipping a change to address this.” Asked why only conservative Republicans appear to be affected and not liberal Democrats, the spokesperson wrote: “I’d emphasize that our technology is based on account *behavior* not the content of Tweets.”

Twitter directed VICE News to a May 15 blog post that explained the company’s new approach to combating “troll-like behaviors.” After making changes to its platform, the company said that “[t]he result is that people contributing to the healthy conversation will be more visible in conversations and search.”

Twitter did not respond to a follow-up question.

Twitter’s troll hunt, however, has ensnared some of the most prominent Republicans in the country. Type in the names of McDaniel, conservative members of Congress like Reps. Mark Meadows, Jim Jordan, and Matt Gaetz, and Trump Jr.’s spokesman Andrew Surabian, for example, and Twitter’s drop-down search bar does not show their profiles. The search menu also does not display the verified profile of Rep. Devin Nunes of California, only his unverified one that he seldom uses to post.

That limits their visibility and the ease of finding their profiles compared to their liberal counterparts.

UPDATE: July 26, 10:00 AM: Twitter appears to have adjusted its platform overnight to no longer limit the visibility of some prominent Republicans in its search results.”

At what point do social media platforms give the control back to the people? Users should not have to worry about their views being censored by the machine.

Censoring any content that is not illegal should not be tolerated by the users.

Continue Reading

Like Us on Facebook



No trending posts found at this time.