Connect with us


Nasty Lib Kids Pummel Trump Vets With Eggs, Almost Got Away With It Until Driver Hit The Gas! [WATCH]




Trump supporting veterans were having some fun while proudly displaying American flags and Trump flags. It was just a nice sunny day when they were on the side of the road and people were joyfully honking horns if they supported. Some people didn’t care for the display, so they just drove by quietly and minded their own business. Those who were in support either yelled something friendly out of the window or honked their horn in a playful manner. It was a normal fun day for people having a miniature rally in support of America and President Trump.

One woman was recording the events of the day and showing the pride and patriotism that some people showed.

Even the people who didn’t care for the display of the flags were still respectful and were not rude. That’s when things turned for the worse. One vehicle drove by and did something that all the other cards didn’t do. This vehicle was filled with some younger ladies who had a nasty surprise for the Trump supporting American citizens. The ladies in the car allegedly threw frozen eggs at the people who were sporting the Trump and American flags. If that wasn’t bad enough, then the vehicle navigated the road back to the scene of the egging and threw more eggs.

Trending: First Video of Latest Trump Star Vandal Swinging Pickaxe Shows What Happened – Spread Like Wildfire

One lady who was recording the fun day for patriotic Americans was hit directly in the head with a frozen egg. The woman has a brain tumor & recently had brain surgery. She screamed out in pain and swore and screamed loudly in pain after she was hit.

The incident was caught on video and contains a brief moment of vulgar language.

Here is the video of the supportive people getting attacked with frozen eggs.

Flag waving Roseville corner of Douglas and Eureka edit: WARNING there is bad LANGUAGE in the video! we got attacked by teens throwing frozen eggs at us, I was hit hard on the left side of my head. I have a goose egg and it hurts. Two others were hit with eggs too. These teen girls are such idiots that they drove by us twice and we got the license plate, we reported it to the police and I am pressing charges. Sorry for my language when I was hit with the egg, it hurt!

Posted by Beth Henderson on Tuesday, April 17, 2018

After they were egged by the mischievous youth, there was someone who was quick-thinking who got in their vehicle and chased them down. They went after the car from which the suspected “eggers” came from. They caught up with them in a parking lot or other location and confronted them. They asked them if they wanted their eggs back. The passengers in the car acted like they didn’t know what anyone was talking about, which is often what people do when they’re caught “egg-handed” in an abusive attack on fellow Americans.

Here is the video in which the eggers were caught up with and confronted.

Posted by Karreen Denning on Tuesday, April 17, 2018

A man catches up to the car and it appears to be an SUV full of young adult females, perhaps late teens such as 18. The man asks them if they would like to have their eggs back and the girls appear to be very defensive about it. The man captures their license plate and he continued talking to them about the situation. Not much happened after that, but many believe that the man may have called the police to report the assault with the frozen eggs. It is unknown if the eggs were hard boiled or not.

It is believed that the people involved might be students at the Oakmont High School in California. The information to the school, as per Google, is listed as:

Address: 1710 Cirby Way, Roseville, CA 95661
Principal: Rob Hasty
Phone: (916) 782-3781

The website to the school is listed here.

Call & email the principal & ask what is going to be done to the students since this happened during school hours.

Also, call the Roseville Police Department and tell them you want these criminals arrested.

The number to the station is: (916) 774-5000.

UPDATE: One of the women who attended the rally sent us a message that the girl who was hit in the head is now being harassed by those on the left. It seems she was getting hate mail all night.

“Now the girl that got hit in the head is getting hate mail. She has a brain tumor and had a good majority of it removed but not all of it. So, her getting hit in the head is a very big deal. Apparently she has been getting hate messages all night.”

The person who sent that message is pictured below.

And another hateful remark.

Here’s more from the woman at the rally:

“I just got a phone call from the supervising officer that first showed up and talk to us while he was sitting in his SUV. He has told me that they found the girls and two were adults and two were juveniles. He says our evidence is lacking because even though it shows little bits and pieces of the vehicle that there’s no hard proof evidence that this for sure were the exact same girls. He says though that one of the girls did admitted to it, so they have a confession. The other ones aren’t saying anything. He says as far as the two older ones (yes they are legal adults 18+ years old) there’s not much they could do to them and as far as the juveniles (2 are younger than 18) there’s a little more that they can do. Charges will be pressed. It has to go through the court system. We most likely will be called as witnesses/ victims. But the supervising officer asked that we stop “harassing” officer Lawley. @Jeffrey Perry I fully appreciate everything that you did yesterday in the video that you got. I think it’s in their hands now and we just need to let them take care of it. He assured me that charges are being pressed and due process will happen. He even mentioned that they got traffic cam footage of it.”

This incident sparks a conversation that can be used to teach a lesson that helps everyone in society become better people. If the girls didn’t like what they saw, then they should have simply kept driving and ignored it. By attacking the people whom they disagree with, they then turn into the one who does wrong. When people attack each other for having a different opinion or supporting a different cause, then that’s where they automatically become the person in the wrong.

This same thing correlates with social media. People who attack others for a different opinion or liking something different are automatically in the wrong. Anytime you see a social media post and report it because you don’t like it, then you’re in the wrong. People don’t have to report or attack everything they see. People can simply ignore things and not pay much attention to them. People who attack each other or report social media posts because they dislike something are acting irresponsibly and should not do that.

If we see something we don’t like, then we should openly discuss it. We can disagree, agree, and report on it. However, if we really don’t like something, then we can keep scrolling.

There is no need to attack people with physical violence or reporting them on social media simply because you disagree with them.

What’s your opinion on this incident with the eggs? Do you ever see people who report everything on social media because they “disagree” with it? Is that how we should behave as adults? Share your comments and this article with your friends on Facebook. Have a good chat about it!

Join the conversation

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.


Dem Candidate Pushing ‘Irresponsible Breeder’ Tax On Certain Parents Because Of ‘Privilege’



Scott Wallace is a multimillionaire running in Pennsylvania’s 1st Congressional District against current incumbent Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (PA-R). Considered an elite, even amongst the wealthy, he boasts a net worth of between $127 million and $309 million, according to his financial disclosure statement. This would make him the third-richest member of Congress if he were elected to the House today.

From a hardline leftist pedigree, his grandfather was Henry Wallace, the “New Deal visionary” and one-time vice president under former President Franklin D. Roosevelt. His wealth is inherited, stemming from a seed company his grandfather founded that was purchased by DuPont for $10 billion in the 1990s, along with a large number of stocks with the largest being DowDuPont.

His campaign is largely self funded with Wallace claiming he is “putting a significant amount of my own assets into this because this is the most important thing I can imagine doing for America at this point in my life — this is a very expensive district to run in, but it is crucial in the Democrats’ efforts to retake the House.”

But just why this is so incredibly important to Wallace goes beyond the typical party lines of Republican and Democrat. Receiving endorsements from both Planned Parenthood and the National Organization for Women (NOW), Wallace is a population control zealot who believes families who choose to have more than two children are “irresponsible breeders” and should be taxed. Wallace has donated nearly $7 million dollars to various population control groups over the past 20 years, with the majority going through his own Wallace Global Fund.  In addition to its efforts towards population control, the foundation has also reportedly donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to anti-Israel groups that support a boycott of the Jewish State.

Fox News reports:

“Zero Population Growth (ZPG) was among the organizations that received the money from the fund. According to public records, it received $420,000 between 1997 and 2003.

The group, shortly after being founded in 1968, released a brochure advocating abortion to stabilize population growth and claimed that “no responsible family should have more than two children.” To deal with larger families, it also called for families to be “taxed to the hilt” for “irresponsible breeding.”

It also blamed the overpopulation on the ‘white middle-class’ that ‘use up more than their share of resources and do more than their share of polluting‘ and urged them to ‘voluntarily limit their families to two children.’

Paul Ehrlich, who co-founded the ZPG, once called abortion “a highly effective weapon in the armory of population control.” The goal of the organization, which changed its name to Population Connection in 2002, has remained the same since its inception, arguing that the world needs to contain population growth with particular emphasis on American families.

The organization’s political arm, Population Connection Action Fund, publicly endorsed Wallace for Congress, saying his support for their cause is “exactly the kind of dedication we need in Congress.”

Wallace’s fund also gave $20,000 in 2010 to the Center for the Advancement of the Steady State Economy (CASSE), a group that sees the economic growth as undesirable and instead supports an economy with ‘stable or mildly fluctuating levels’ and a society where birth rates equal death rates.

The organization openly supports zero population growth and its executive board member, Herman Daly, advocated issuing reproduction licenses, allowing women to have only two children unless they buy the license for more children from other women. Daly called it the ‘best plan yet offered’ to limit population growth.”

The group advocates strongly for abortion and along with taxing families “to the hilt” for having more than two children, as noted in a Yale Law School publication about the “voices that shaped the abortion debate before the Roe v. Wade Supreme Court’s ruling.”

The group advocates that –

  1. That no responsible family should have more than two children. Any family wanting to care for more than two children should adopt further children. Adopting children does not increase the population.
  2. All methods of birth control, including legalized abortion, should be freely available—and at no cost in poverty cases.
  3. Irresponsible people who have more than two children should be taxed to the hilt for the privilege of irresponsible breeding.

Fox News continued:

Zoe Wilson-Meyer, communications director for Wallace’s campaign, didn’t answer Fox News’ questions on whether Wallace still supports the ideas expressed by the groups.

“The Wallace Global Fund has for decades been a leader in helping women gain access to family planning. Former Co-Chair Scott Wallace is proud of the work of grantees like Planned Parenthood in empowering women and protecting reproductive rights and will stand up for Pennsylvania women,” she said in an email.

“In Washington, Brian Fitzpatrick voted to defund Planned Parenthood and supports Donald Trump’s effort to take away a woman’s right to choose,” she added.

Largely reminiscent of Nazi Germany who exercised eugenics to its full and most horrific potential, this policy of so-called “irresponsible breeders” also resembles the one-child policy from China that saw forced abortions or other forced invasive birth control procedures. Yet eugenics practices had their roots in America as well. American newspapers frequently offered praise for eugenics just prior to WWII and The Holocaust …. that is until Adolf Hitler revealed the true horrors of what eugenics really looked like. They avoided the subject for decades thereafter.

Nine out of ten eugenicists in the 20th Century were also Progressives or Socialists, and the most central component to the eugenic creed is the desire to engineer and centrally plan human reproduction, weeding out the unwanted or undesirable, according to a report on eugenics by PBS.

Yet where does that end? Who determines who is undesirable? Is it the unborn child conceived at an inconvenient time? The elderly mother? The child with cerebral palsy? Those with PTSD? Autism? Blue eyes? White skin? You cannot get to genocide without first visiting identity politics and they say the propagandist’s job is to effectively make the people forget his “enemy” is, in fact, a human being just as he is. It seems we never really do learn from history, do we?

Continue Reading


Trump Issued Major Warning: ‘We Will Look Into Discriminatory and Illegal Practice’ – It’s On!

Huge problems and everyone needs to know!



President Donald Trump voiced his concerns over “discriminatory and illegal practice” when he posted about the alleged controversy going on with Republicans being censored on Twitter. The tactic is sometimes referred to as “shadow banning” and it seems to be a strategy that social media platforms use to limit the visibility of some people. For example, ever wonder why someone who is genuinely popular might have tons of followers but their posts don’t seem to get many responses? It could be one of several reasons. Either they have fake followers, the post is no good, or they are being censored. In many cases, it’s a form of censorship that’s the obvious result. When a social media user goes from getting a lot of replies and views on their posts, then all of a sudden there’s very little replies and it seems like no one has seen the post – then they were hit with that form of censorship or suppression.

Social media platforms such as Twitter and Facebook have been called out for suppressing the content of certain Republican voices or those who support President Donald Trump. Well-known stars like Diamond and Silk have made it very public that they feel targeted for the views and opinions on their pages. That’s just the tip of the iceberg because the problem spans from targeting well-known mainstream people all the way down to the independent publishers. Censorship like this is affecting people’s careers and causing an unbalanced platform in which people with certain views are being limited. It might not be listed as a “ban” but it’s certainly limiting the viewership of certain people. The content that would once appear in people’s feed or timeline now requires a fine-tooth comb to find and it seems like people are realizing this more often and being upset with it.

Trump spoke about it on Twitter and Vice News completed a report on it.

Vice News reported: “Twitter is limiting the visibility of prominent Republicans in search results — a technique known as “shadow banning” — in what it says is a side effect of its attempts to improve the quality of discourse on the platform.

The Republican Party chair Ronna McDaniel, several conservative Republican congressmen, and Donald Trump Jr.’s spokesman no longer appear in the auto-populated drop-down search box on Twitter, VICE News has learned. It’s a shift that diminishes their reach on the platform — and it’s the same one being deployed against prominent racists to limit their visibility. The profiles continue to appear when conducting a full search, but not in the more convenient and visible drop-down bar. (The accounts appear to also populate if you already follow the person.)

Democrats are not being “shadow banned” in the same way, according to a VICE News review. McDaniel’s counterpart, Democratic Party chair Tom Perez, and liberal members of Congress — including Reps. Maxine Waters, Joe Kennedy III, Keith Ellison, and Mark Pocan — all continue to appear in drop-down search results. Not a single member of the 78-person Progressive Caucus faces the same situation in Twitter’s search.

“The notion that social media companies would suppress certain political points of view should concern every American,” McDaniel told VICE News in a statement. “Twitter owes the public answers to what’s really going on.”

Presented with screenshots of the searches, a Twitter spokesperson told VICE News: “We are aware that some accounts are not automatically populating in our search box and shipping a change to address this.” Asked why only conservative Republicans appear to be affected and not liberal Democrats, the spokesperson wrote: “I’d emphasize that our technology is based on account *behavior* not the content of Tweets.”

Twitter directed VICE News to a May 15 blog post that explained the company’s new approach to combating “troll-like behaviors.” After making changes to its platform, the company said that “[t]he result is that people contributing to the healthy conversation will be more visible in conversations and search.”

Twitter did not respond to a follow-up question.

Twitter’s troll hunt, however, has ensnared some of the most prominent Republicans in the country. Type in the names of McDaniel, conservative members of Congress like Reps. Mark Meadows, Jim Jordan, and Matt Gaetz, and Trump Jr.’s spokesman Andrew Surabian, for example, and Twitter’s drop-down search bar does not show their profiles. The search menu also does not display the verified profile of Rep. Devin Nunes of California, only his unverified one that he seldom uses to post.

That limits their visibility and the ease of finding their profiles compared to their liberal counterparts.

UPDATE: July 26, 10:00 AM: Twitter appears to have adjusted its platform overnight to no longer limit the visibility of some prominent Republicans in its search results.”

At what point do social media platforms give the control back to the people? Users should not have to worry about their views being censored by the machine.

Censoring any content that is not illegal should not be tolerated by the users.

Continue Reading

Like Us on Facebook



No trending posts found at this time.