Connect with us

News

Trump Sent Hidden Message To Putin In Middle Of Summit That Has Liberals Outraged

This is what Really happened!

Published

on

President Trump and First Lady Melania Trump arrived in Helsinki late Sunday night for his long-awaited summit meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Though this is not the first time the two world leaders have met, Monday’s summit will be the first sit down meeting between the two leaders since President Trump’s inauguration.

Coming on the heels of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s suspiciously timed round of indictments against a dozen Russian military intelligence officials, Democratic lawmakers were highly critical of President Trump and his decision to move forward as planned with Putin.

Meanwhile, President Trump had more than a few choice words for his political opponents in return. He publically berated his political opponents blaming them for their woefully transparent attempts to sabotage this meeting between the two world leaders with the indictments.

Just scant hours prior to sitting down with the Russian leader, President Trump took to Twitter to blast former President Barack Obama, blaming him for the so-called Russian interference during the 2016 election stating in no uncertain terms that it was clear Obama knew about the interference, yet chose to do nothing. President Trump also took the opportunity to blast his political opponents for allowing U.S./Russia relations to deteriorate to a point where it “has never been worse.”

Trending: Patriots Former Tight End Martellus Bennett Just Made Sickening Allegation About Trump

In a series of tweets, President Trump stated – “President Obama thought that Crooked Hillary was going to win the election, so when he was informed by the FBI about Russian Meddling, he said it couldn’t happen, was no big deal, & did NOTHING about it. When I won it became a big deal and the Rigged Witch Hunt headed by Strzok!”

He added – Our relationship with Russia has NEVER been worse thanks to many years of U.S. foolishness and stupidity and now, the Rigged Witch Hunt!

National Security Advisor John Bolton said President Trump was briefed in advance regarding the indictments of the Russian intelligence agents.  In a Sunday interview just prior to leaving, President Trump cautioned that he had “low expectations” going into the summit because no matter what he accomplishes, the American mainstream media and President Trump’s political opponents will claim it was not enough.

Meanwhile, the Kremlin stated prior to the meeting they shared a similar feeling of low expectation after pushing back against President Trump’s open criticisms of a planned Russian gas pipeline to Germany at the recent NATO Summit and suggested it may be difficult to find any sort of common ground on Syria due to rising tensions over Iran.

After a brief delay reportedly caused by President Putin, President Trump and his Russian counterpart gathered for a brief press conference prior to the start of their 90-minute summit meeting, during which the two men plan to meet alone to discuss a range of issues. Among those issues discussed were trade, nuclear issues, China, US/Russia relations, and other pressing matters.

Watch the press conference, which is expected to begin around 9:30 am ET, on the feed below:

The one-on-one phase of the Helsinki summit went longer than expected as Putin and Trump were locked in private conversation for more than two hours, considerably longer than the originally allotted 90 minutes. A planned press briefing is to follow and will be the first opportunity the press and the rest of the world will learn exactly what the two leaders discussed, though as usual the American media is already declaring the meeting a “failure” and decrying President Trump’s “weakness.”

NBC News went into full panic mode – “This is remarkable. President Trump, President Putin are going to be alone in a room for 90 minutes with only their interpreters.”

Followed by The Intercept’s Glenn Greenwald and his reminder to his followers – “In 1987, when Reagan met with Soviet leadership, the Far Right took out ads attacking him as a “Useful Idiot” for Russian propaganda, and of betraying America by legitimizing Russian aggression and domestic repression.”

And already the talking heads on CNBC have proclaimed that “it was a weak opening by Trump.”

The two men shared a handshake, as President Trump stated to Putin:”I really think the world wants to see us get along.”

Despite the importance of the meeting between the two leaders, the media chose to focus on the inconsequential. President Trump offered a cheeky wink to Putin as the two shook hands. Liberal heads collectively exploded as they voiced their faux outrage and claims that somehow this wink PROVES collusion!

The Sun reports of the events –

“As the leaders locked eyes over the small table separating them, Trump, 72, gave the Russian president a cheeky wink.

Putin, 65, replied with a curt smile and gestures for the former reality TV star to say a few words before they retreated to a private meeting room.

Trump opened by praising Russia for hosting what he thought was one of the “best ever” World Cups.

He went on to say he wanted good relations with Russia and blamed Washington’s own “foolishness and stupidity” for the hostile ties.

He added: “I’ve been saying… that getting along with Russia is a good thing not a bad thing.

Trump said they would talk about a range of subjects, listing trade, the military, nuclear weapons and China.

But, at least in his public remarks, he mentioned none of the issues which have lately brought US-Russian relations to their lowest point since the Cold War.

These include Moscow’s annexation of Ukraine, its support for Bashar al-Assad, accusations the Kremlin poisoned a spy in England and meddled in US elections.

Instead, Trump saved his public criticism for his own country in tweets before the summit.

He wrote: “Our relationship with Russia has never been worse thanks to many years of foolishness and stupidity and now, the rigged witch hunt!”

The Russian foreign ministry “liked” his tweet while the Kremlin played down expectations of what should be expected at the meet.

Before the summit, Russia said it did not expect much from the meeting but hoped it would be a “first step” to resolving a crisis in ties.”

Yet just as the American mainstream media has done with everything else, including President Trump’s recent summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, the media is attempting to minimize, diminish, and otherwise tarnish any attempts at peace. Naturally, one of the first questions President Trump was asked was about whether he confronted his Russian counterpart about extraditing Russian intelligence officers indicted by the DOJ.

Putin indicated in the press conference that he “may be open to allowing Mueller and his investigators into Russia to question Russian nationals, but would expect Russian officials to get same treatment on other end.”

Putin also went after the American press stating – “Where did you get this idea that President Trump trusts me or I trust him?”

Zero Hedge reported point by point on the topics hit in the Press Conference –

The press conference has begun, with Putin describing the talks as “business-like.”

  • *PUTIN: TALKS WITH TRUMP WERE OPEN, BUSINESS LIKE
  • *LAVROV ON OUTCOME OF U.S. TALKS: BETTER THAN SUPER: IFX
  • *PUTIN SAYS TALKS ON U.S.-RUSSIAN TIES WERE PRODUCTIVE
  • *PUTIN: DIFFICULTY IN TIES W/ U.S. DON’T HAVE OBJECTIVE BASIS
  • *PUTIN: RUSSIA, U.S. FACING DIFFERENT PROBLEMS THAN IN COLD WAR
  • *PUTIN: RUSSIA, U.S. CAN ONLY FACE CHALLENGES ACTING TOGETHER
  • *PUTIN: TALKS TODAY ATTEMPTED TO SET TIES BACK ON HEALTHY PATH
  • *PUTIN: AS TOP NUCLEAR POWERS, WE HAVE SPECIAL ROLE IN SECURITY
  • *PUTIN: WE GAVE U.S. PROPOSALS ON NUCLEAR ANTI-PROLIFERATION
  • *PUTIN: RAISED ISSUE OF U.S. MISSILE DEFENSE SHIELDS WITH TRUMP
  • *PUTIN: OUR SPECIAL SERVICES WORKING VERY SUCCESSFULLY
  • *PUTIN SAYS RUSSIA, U.S. COOPERATED ON WORLD CUP SECURITY
  • *PUTIN: WE ALSO TALKED ON REGIONAL CRISES, DIDN’T ALWAYS AGREE
  • *PUTIN SAYS RUSSIA, U.S. CAN LEAD PEACE PROCESS IN SYRIA
  • *PUTIN: RUSSIA, U.S. LEARNED TO COOPERATE ON GROUND IN SYRIA
  • *PUTIN SAYS EXPRESSED CONCERN ON U.S. IRAN POLICY TO TRUMP
  • *PUTIN SAYS DISCUSSED UKRAINE CRISIS WITH TRUMP
  • *PUTIN SAYS HE ALSO DISCUSSED ECONOMIC COOPERATION WITH TRUMP
  • *PUTIN SAYS TRUMP RAISED MEDDLING
  • *PUTIN SAYS HE REITERATED RUSSIA DOESN’T MEDDLE IN U.S. POLITICS
  • *PUTIN SAYS HE PROPOSED NEW APPROACH TO LONG-TERM BILATERAL TIES
  • *PUTIN SAYS WE’RE HAPPY WITH FIRST FULL-SCALE TALKS WITH TRUMP

Trump spoke after Putin, saying the talks were “deeply productive” and congratulated Putin on hosting the World Cup, which he said was “one of the best ever.”

  • *TRUMP SAYS `DEEPLY PRODUCTIVE’ TALK WITH PUTIN WENT VERY WELL
  • *TRUMP SAYS DIPLOMACY BETTER THAN CONFLICT BETWEEN U.S., RUSSIA
  • *TRUMP: U.S.-RUSSIA TIES NEVER WORSE, BUT THAT’S CHANGED NOW
  • *TRUMP SAYS HE BROUGHT UP ELECTION MEDDLING IN PUTIN TALKS
  • *TRUMP SAYS PUTIN HAS `INTERESTING IDEA’ ON ELECTION MEDDLING
  • *TRUMP PRESSED PUTIN ON IRAN’S ROLE IN MIDDLE EAST VIOLENCE
  • *TRUMP: PUTIN IS A COMPETITOR, AND THAT WORD IS A COMPLIMENT
  • *TRUMP: WE’LL BE COMPETING ON LNG AS A SUPPLIER TO EUROPE

The two leaders are now taking questions:

    • *PUTIN: RUSSIA, U.S. CAN WORK TOGETHER ON GLOBAL ENERGY MKTS
    • *TRUMP: BOTH SIDES TO BLAME ON RUSSIA-U.S. TIES DETERIORATING
    • *TRUMP, ALONGSIDE PUTIN, SAYS MUELLER PROBE A `DISASTER’
    • *TRUMP, ALONGSIDE PUTIN, SAYS WAS ZERO COLLUSION WITH RUSSIA
    • *PUTIN: TRUMP SOUGHT BETTER RUSSIA TIES; OF COURSE WE LIKED HIM
    • *PUTIN SAYS DOESN’T KNOW ANYTHING AGAINST ALLEGED 12 AGENTS
    • *PUTIN: RUSSIA, U.S. HAVE TREATY ON CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS
    • *PUTIN: MUELLER CAN SEND OFFICIAL REQUEST UNDER BILATERAL TREATY
    • *PUTIN: RUSSIA WOULD LET U.S. INVESTIGATORS GO TO INTERROGATIONS
    • *PUTIN: U.S. WOULD HAVE TO RECIPROCATE, CITES HERMITAGE CAPITAL
    • *PUTIN SAYS HE WANTED TRUMP TO WIN 2016 ELECTION
    • *TRUMP SAYS BOTH SIDES ARE BELIEVABLE ON U.S. INTEL, PUTIN SIDE
    • *PUTIN SAYS HE WORKED IN INTEL, KNOWS HOW DOSSIERS ARE COMPILED
    • *PUTIN: U.S. SHOULD RELY ON COURTS, NOT INTELLIGENCE FINDINGS
    • *PUTIN SAYS SOROS INTERFERING EVERYWHERE
    • *PUTIN: PLEASE SEND US AN OFFICIAL REQUEST ON THE 12 RUSSIANS
    • *PUTIN: TRUMP HAS SAID CRIMEA WAS ANNEXED ILLEGALLY
    • *PUTIN SAYS HE DIDN’T KNOW TRUMP WAS IN MOSCOW AS GUEST
    • *PUTIN SAYS HUNDREDS OF U.S. BUSINESS LEADERS VISIT EVERY YEAR
    • *PUTIN: RIDICULOUS TO THINK U.S. COLLECTS DIRT ON EVERYONE
    • *TRUMP: IF RUSSIANS HAD COMPROMISING INTEL ON ME, IT’D BE OUT

And as a reminder, while Trump didn’t collude with Russia, another American president might have.

Join the conversation

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

News

Dem Candidate Pushing ‘Irresponsible Breeder’ Tax On Certain Parents Because Of ‘Privilege’

Published

on

Scott Wallace is a multimillionaire running in Pennsylvania’s 1st Congressional District against current incumbent Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (PA-R). Considered an elite, even amongst the wealthy, he boasts a net worth of between $127 million and $309 million, according to his financial disclosure statement. This would make him the third-richest member of Congress if he were elected to the House today.

From a hardline leftist pedigree, his grandfather was Henry Wallace, the “New Deal visionary” and one-time vice president under former President Franklin D. Roosevelt. His wealth is inherited, stemming from a seed company his grandfather founded that was purchased by DuPont for $10 billion in the 1990s, along with a large number of stocks with the largest being DowDuPont.

His campaign is largely self funded with Wallace claiming he is “putting a significant amount of my own assets into this because this is the most important thing I can imagine doing for America at this point in my life — this is a very expensive district to run in, but it is crucial in the Democrats’ efforts to retake the House.”

But just why this is so incredibly important to Wallace goes beyond the typical party lines of Republican and Democrat. Receiving endorsements from both Planned Parenthood and the National Organization for Women (NOW), Wallace is a population control zealot who believes families who choose to have more than two children are “irresponsible breeders” and should be taxed. Wallace has donated nearly $7 million dollars to various population control groups over the past 20 years, with the majority going through his own Wallace Global Fund.  In addition to its efforts towards population control, the foundation has also reportedly donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to anti-Israel groups that support a boycott of the Jewish State.

Fox News reports:

“Zero Population Growth (ZPG) was among the organizations that received the money from the fund. According to public records, it received $420,000 between 1997 and 2003.

The group, shortly after being founded in 1968, released a brochure advocating abortion to stabilize population growth and claimed that “no responsible family should have more than two children.” To deal with larger families, it also called for families to be “taxed to the hilt” for “irresponsible breeding.”

It also blamed the overpopulation on the ‘white middle-class’ that ‘use up more than their share of resources and do more than their share of polluting‘ and urged them to ‘voluntarily limit their families to two children.’

Paul Ehrlich, who co-founded the ZPG, once called abortion “a highly effective weapon in the armory of population control.” The goal of the organization, which changed its name to Population Connection in 2002, has remained the same since its inception, arguing that the world needs to contain population growth with particular emphasis on American families.

The organization’s political arm, Population Connection Action Fund, publicly endorsed Wallace for Congress, saying his support for their cause is “exactly the kind of dedication we need in Congress.”

Wallace’s fund also gave $20,000 in 2010 to the Center for the Advancement of the Steady State Economy (CASSE), a group that sees the economic growth as undesirable and instead supports an economy with ‘stable or mildly fluctuating levels’ and a society where birth rates equal death rates.

The organization openly supports zero population growth and its executive board member, Herman Daly, advocated issuing reproduction licenses, allowing women to have only two children unless they buy the license for more children from other women. Daly called it the ‘best plan yet offered’ to limit population growth.”

The group advocates strongly for abortion and along with taxing families “to the hilt” for having more than two children, as noted in a Yale Law School publication about the “voices that shaped the abortion debate before the Roe v. Wade Supreme Court’s ruling.”

The group advocates that –

  1. That no responsible family should have more than two children. Any family wanting to care for more than two children should adopt further children. Adopting children does not increase the population.
  2. All methods of birth control, including legalized abortion, should be freely available—and at no cost in poverty cases.
  3. Irresponsible people who have more than two children should be taxed to the hilt for the privilege of irresponsible breeding.

Fox News continued:

Zoe Wilson-Meyer, communications director for Wallace’s campaign, didn’t answer Fox News’ questions on whether Wallace still supports the ideas expressed by the groups.

“The Wallace Global Fund has for decades been a leader in helping women gain access to family planning. Former Co-Chair Scott Wallace is proud of the work of grantees like Planned Parenthood in empowering women and protecting reproductive rights and will stand up for Pennsylvania women,” she said in an email.

“In Washington, Brian Fitzpatrick voted to defund Planned Parenthood and supports Donald Trump’s effort to take away a woman’s right to choose,” she added.

Largely reminiscent of Nazi Germany who exercised eugenics to its full and most horrific potential, this policy of so-called “irresponsible breeders” also resembles the one-child policy from China that saw forced abortions or other forced invasive birth control procedures. Yet eugenics practices had their roots in America as well. American newspapers frequently offered praise for eugenics just prior to WWII and The Holocaust …. that is until Adolf Hitler revealed the true horrors of what eugenics really looked like. They avoided the subject for decades thereafter.

Nine out of ten eugenicists in the 20th Century were also Progressives or Socialists, and the most central component to the eugenic creed is the desire to engineer and centrally plan human reproduction, weeding out the unwanted or undesirable, according to a report on eugenics by PBS.

Yet where does that end? Who determines who is undesirable? Is it the unborn child conceived at an inconvenient time? The elderly mother? The child with cerebral palsy? Those with PTSD? Autism? Blue eyes? White skin? You cannot get to genocide without first visiting identity politics and they say the propagandist’s job is to effectively make the people forget his “enemy” is, in fact, a human being just as he is. It seems we never really do learn from history, do we?

Continue Reading

News

Trump Issued Major Warning: ‘We Will Look Into Discriminatory and Illegal Practice’ – It’s On!

Huge problems and everyone needs to know!

Published

on

President Donald Trump voiced his concerns over “discriminatory and illegal practice” when he posted about the alleged controversy going on with Republicans being censored on Twitter. The tactic is sometimes referred to as “shadow banning” and it seems to be a strategy that social media platforms use to limit the visibility of some people. For example, ever wonder why someone who is genuinely popular might have tons of followers but their posts don’t seem to get many responses? It could be one of several reasons. Either they have fake followers, the post is no good, or they are being censored. In many cases, it’s a form of censorship that’s the obvious result. When a social media user goes from getting a lot of replies and views on their posts, then all of a sudden there’s very little replies and it seems like no one has seen the post – then they were hit with that form of censorship or suppression.

Social media platforms such as Twitter and Facebook have been called out for suppressing the content of certain Republican voices or those who support President Donald Trump. Well-known stars like Diamond and Silk have made it very public that they feel targeted for the views and opinions on their pages. That’s just the tip of the iceberg because the problem spans from targeting well-known mainstream people all the way down to the independent publishers. Censorship like this is affecting people’s careers and causing an unbalanced platform in which people with certain views are being limited. It might not be listed as a “ban” but it’s certainly limiting the viewership of certain people. The content that would once appear in people’s feed or timeline now requires a fine-tooth comb to find and it seems like people are realizing this more often and being upset with it.

Trump spoke about it on Twitter and Vice News completed a report on it.

Vice News reported: “Twitter is limiting the visibility of prominent Republicans in search results — a technique known as “shadow banning” — in what it says is a side effect of its attempts to improve the quality of discourse on the platform.

The Republican Party chair Ronna McDaniel, several conservative Republican congressmen, and Donald Trump Jr.’s spokesman no longer appear in the auto-populated drop-down search box on Twitter, VICE News has learned. It’s a shift that diminishes their reach on the platform — and it’s the same one being deployed against prominent racists to limit their visibility. The profiles continue to appear when conducting a full search, but not in the more convenient and visible drop-down bar. (The accounts appear to also populate if you already follow the person.)

Democrats are not being “shadow banned” in the same way, according to a VICE News review. McDaniel’s counterpart, Democratic Party chair Tom Perez, and liberal members of Congress — including Reps. Maxine Waters, Joe Kennedy III, Keith Ellison, and Mark Pocan — all continue to appear in drop-down search results. Not a single member of the 78-person Progressive Caucus faces the same situation in Twitter’s search.

“The notion that social media companies would suppress certain political points of view should concern every American,” McDaniel told VICE News in a statement. “Twitter owes the public answers to what’s really going on.”

Presented with screenshots of the searches, a Twitter spokesperson told VICE News: “We are aware that some accounts are not automatically populating in our search box and shipping a change to address this.” Asked why only conservative Republicans appear to be affected and not liberal Democrats, the spokesperson wrote: “I’d emphasize that our technology is based on account *behavior* not the content of Tweets.”

Twitter directed VICE News to a May 15 blog post that explained the company’s new approach to combating “troll-like behaviors.” After making changes to its platform, the company said that “[t]he result is that people contributing to the healthy conversation will be more visible in conversations and search.”

Twitter did not respond to a follow-up question.

Twitter’s troll hunt, however, has ensnared some of the most prominent Republicans in the country. Type in the names of McDaniel, conservative members of Congress like Reps. Mark Meadows, Jim Jordan, and Matt Gaetz, and Trump Jr.’s spokesman Andrew Surabian, for example, and Twitter’s drop-down search bar does not show their profiles. The search menu also does not display the verified profile of Rep. Devin Nunes of California, only his unverified one that he seldom uses to post.

That limits their visibility and the ease of finding their profiles compared to their liberal counterparts.

UPDATE: July 26, 10:00 AM: Twitter appears to have adjusted its platform overnight to no longer limit the visibility of some prominent Republicans in its search results.”

At what point do social media platforms give the control back to the people? Users should not have to worry about their views being censored by the machine.

Censoring any content that is not illegal should not be tolerated by the users.

Continue Reading

Like Us on Facebook

Recent

Trending

No trending posts found at this time.