Connect with us

News

Trump Announces Hidden Evidence, Ends Mueller Investigation Once And For All

It’s unreal what they did!

Published

on

The Saturday release of the FBI’s heavily redacted FISA warrant application for Carter Page reveals almost as much as it conceals regarding the Obama administration, and none of it good. Fervent in their quest to make a case against what they viewed as the “enemy,” the Obama administration made a case to spy on a US citizen and the Trump campaign, reducing their fourth amendment rights to little more than words on paper.

The case was cobbled together by a series of facts, conjecture, and innuendo comprised of known information regarding Page’s previous business dealings in Russia, several articles from varying news media sources of varying reliability, and the infamous and highly salacious Clinton-funded “Steele Dossier.” The FBI went to significant lengths to justify the use of the unverified and unsourced dossier despite being unable to verify the claims it made.

Trending: Patriots Former Tight End Martellus Bennett Just Made Sickening Allegation About Trump

Of significant concern is the stark disconnect between the FBI and their multitude of accusations against Page and the fact that Page has not been charged with a single, solitary crime after nearly two years worth of investigation by both the Department of Justice and the FBI. Once issued by the court, the FISA warrant along with its subsequent renewals allowed the Obama administration the ability to spy on the Trump campaign using the extensive and far-reaching capabilities of the government to conduct a wide-ranging investigation.

The original October 2016 FISA application described Page in the blackest, most heinous terms possible with the sole intention of convincing a FISA judge to grant the warrant allowing them unfettered access. The application is full of flat out accusations of being a Russian spy directly recruited by the Kremlin itself are made against Page throughout claiming his sole intention was to “undermine and influence the outcome of the 2016 U.S. presidential election in violation of U.S. criminal law.”

As a means to support their accusations, the FBI presented a variety of claims as fact using the unverified and unproven dossier as “evidence” to support their false claims. The FISA application makes such statements as – “The FBI learned that Page met with at least two Russian officials” – when in fact no investigation of any kind had taken place, nor was any warranted based on the unverified nature of the dossier.

Then there was the circular chain of evidence used. The FISA warrant application actually cites as “evidence” to gain the court’s approval for the warrant a letter written in September 2016 by former Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid to former FBI Director James Comey citing information Reid received from former CIA Director John Brennan who in turn originally got that same information from the unverified Clinton dossier.

The application also proves FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok lied when he testified before Congress that he had nothing to do with the FISA application. The disgraced FBI agent actually used Carter Page’s September 2016 letter to Comey to defend himself against a Yahoo! News article written by Michael Isikoff and then using that very same September 2016 letter as a pretext to then open an investigation into Page. Isikoff used information directly obtained from Steele and in fact, does not quote Page at all. He never spoke to Page, yet this article was also used as “evidence” in the application.

In fact, aside from the Clinton-funded Steele dossier, the FISA warrant cites no other evidentiary source listed in the entirety of the documents other than Source #1. Source #1 is Christopher Steele, author of the unverified Steele dossier. There is no Source #2 or Source #3, etc. There is only Source #1.

The application reveals that the FBI never once indicated to the court that the main source of evidence supporting their request for surveillance was actually opposition research funded directly by Hillary Clinton’s election campaign and in fact was disproven and factless. A document that Steele himself actually stated was unverified. It merely says he was hired by a “business associate” and a “law firm,” and never directly identifies Hillary Clinton, her campaign, or Perkins Coie, DNC attorney, etc. by name at all.

Per the Washington Times, from an article dated April 25, 2017 –

“Christopher Steele, the former British spy who wrote the infamous anti-Donald Trump dossier, acknowledges that a sensational charge his sources made about a tech company CEO and Democratic Party hacking is unverified.

In a court filing, Mr. Steele also says his accusations against the president and his aides about a supposed Russian hacking conspiracy were never supposed to be made public, much less posted in full on a website for the world to see on Jan. 10.”

At one point the FBI even pretended they had no idea the so-called “Western intelligence source” referred to in a cited Yahoo! News article they liberally quoted in support of FISA warrant application was, in fact, the same Clinton funded and unproven Steele dossier. In fact, the FBI actually attempted to downplay the fact that Steele directly fed Isikoff information for his article, when in fact he did.

“Obviously the information that I got from Christopher Steele was information the FBI already had,” Isikoff said in a February podcast.

In addition, the FBI further compounded their deceit to the court going to extreme lengths to convince the FISA Judge that Steele a/k/a Source #1 was still a “reliable” source of information when they could not verify the unsubstantiated claims in his dossier, while also explaining just exactly why they believed his information was still considered trustworthy after directly terminating Steele’s contract with the FBI due to inappropriate leaks and disclosures he made to the media.

Directly from the application for the FISA warrant against Carter Page – “Not withstanding Source1’s reason for conducting the research into Candidate1’s ties to Russia, based on Source1’s previous reporting history with the FBI, whereby Source1 provided reliable information to the FBI, the FBI believes Source 1s reporting herein to be credible.”

The application also confirms a report from February that the FBI received a copy of the Steele dossier directly from the Obama State Department after Steele provided a copy to DoS official Jonathan Winer. Winer was ALSO approached by long-time known confidant of the Clintons – Sydney Blumenthal who was in possession of additional opposition research in the form of a second anti-Trump dossier. This dossier was written by another longtime friend of the Clintons – Cody Shearer.

Both dossiers then were taken to the State Department and from there went into the hands of the FBI. The FBI had previously received a copy early in August of 2016 directly from Steele himself. Since that time it has been revealed that there were multiple versions of the dossiers that made their way to the FBI via various avenues.  Though for reasons currently unknown the FBI chose to highlight the dossier that was provided to the State Department as a source of evidence. It is speculated that was done in an effort to enhance credibility.

The question on the lips of anyone paying attention now is to wonder just how many prior FISA warrants have been based on opposition research with the use of flimsy and uncorroborated evidence written by salacious gossip peddlers such as Fusion GPS while working in conjunction with the FBI in an effort to target American citizens merely because of their political affiliations. It has been done before using the IRS and clearly based on the evidence available it is not too far of a stretch.

The FBI’s use of unverified and unsubstantiated information paid for by a political opponent and provided by a foreign national that happens to also be a former part of foreign intelligence to support spying on an American citizen, combined with a 90 day extension being granted despite the fact that it was blatantly obvious by June 2017 that Page was not a Russian agent gives clear credence to President Donald Trump’s accusations that the entire Russia investigation was little more than a “witch hunt.”

President Trump took to social media with a series of tweets in response to the information available regarding Page’s FISA warrant applications, stating –

“So we now find out that it was indeed the unverified and Fake Dirty Dossier, that was paid for by Crooked Hillary Clinton and the DNC, that was knowingly & falsely submitted to FISA and which was responsible for starting the totally conflicted and discredited Mueller Witch Hunt!”

In the second tweet he continued – “It was classified to cover up misconduct by the FBI and the Justice Department in misleading the Court by using this Dossier in a dishonest way to gain a warrant to target the Trump Team. This is a Clinton Campaign document. It was a fraud and a hoax designed to target Trump….”

And continuing in a third tweet – “….and the DOJ, FBI and Obama Gang need to be held to account. Source #1 was the major source. Avoided talking about it being the Clinton campaign behind it. Misled the Court to provide a pretext to SPY on the Trump Team. Not about Carter Page..was all about getting Trump…..”

Then President Trump summed it up in a fourth and final tweet, stating – …..”Carter Page wasn’t a spy, wasn’t an agent of the Russians – he would have cooperated with the FBI. It was a fraud and a hoax designed to target Trump.” Tom Fitton @JudicialWatch A disgrace to America. They should drop the discredited Mueller Witch Hunt now!”

Politico reports on President Trump’s intentions to declassify the redacted portions of the memo to quell naysayers –

“Asked during Monday’s White House press briefing if the president would meet the requests of House Republicans, who have urged him to declassify portions of the FISA court documents related to Page’s surveillance, press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders told reporters that Trump ‘has purposefully remained uninvolved in this process.’

‘He’s said repeatedly that he wants the Department of Justice to be fully transparent with these requests from Congress. And he’s going to continue at this point to remain uninvolved,’ she said. ‘However, he sees more and more every single day that this is proving further and further to be a total witch hunt. Particularly because it was based on a false and unverified and discredited dossier.’

The president has long complained about Mueller’s probe, repeatedly referring to it as a “witch hunt” and insisting that it amounts to little more than an excuse for Democrats embarrassed by Clinton’s 2016 presidential election loss.

He has threatened to potentially intervene with the Justice Department, and on Monday, Trump came closer to making good on that threat by writing in a later tweet that law enforcement officials ‘should drop the discredited Mueller Witch Hunt now!'”

Join the conversation

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

News

Dem Candidate Pushing ‘Irresponsible Breeder’ Tax On Certain Parents Because Of ‘Privilege’

Published

on

Scott Wallace is a multimillionaire running in Pennsylvania’s 1st Congressional District against current incumbent Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (PA-R). Considered an elite, even amongst the wealthy, he boasts a net worth of between $127 million and $309 million, according to his financial disclosure statement. This would make him the third-richest member of Congress if he were elected to the House today.

From a hardline leftist pedigree, his grandfather was Henry Wallace, the “New Deal visionary” and one-time vice president under former President Franklin D. Roosevelt. His wealth is inherited, stemming from a seed company his grandfather founded that was purchased by DuPont for $10 billion in the 1990s, along with a large number of stocks with the largest being DowDuPont.

His campaign is largely self funded with Wallace claiming he is “putting a significant amount of my own assets into this because this is the most important thing I can imagine doing for America at this point in my life — this is a very expensive district to run in, but it is crucial in the Democrats’ efforts to retake the House.”

But just why this is so incredibly important to Wallace goes beyond the typical party lines of Republican and Democrat. Receiving endorsements from both Planned Parenthood and the National Organization for Women (NOW), Wallace is a population control zealot who believes families who choose to have more than two children are “irresponsible breeders” and should be taxed. Wallace has donated nearly $7 million dollars to various population control groups over the past 20 years, with the majority going through his own Wallace Global Fund.  In addition to its efforts towards population control, the foundation has also reportedly donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to anti-Israel groups that support a boycott of the Jewish State.

Fox News reports:

“Zero Population Growth (ZPG) was among the organizations that received the money from the fund. According to public records, it received $420,000 between 1997 and 2003.

The group, shortly after being founded in 1968, released a brochure advocating abortion to stabilize population growth and claimed that “no responsible family should have more than two children.” To deal with larger families, it also called for families to be “taxed to the hilt” for “irresponsible breeding.”

It also blamed the overpopulation on the ‘white middle-class’ that ‘use up more than their share of resources and do more than their share of polluting‘ and urged them to ‘voluntarily limit their families to two children.’

Paul Ehrlich, who co-founded the ZPG, once called abortion “a highly effective weapon in the armory of population control.” The goal of the organization, which changed its name to Population Connection in 2002, has remained the same since its inception, arguing that the world needs to contain population growth with particular emphasis on American families.

The organization’s political arm, Population Connection Action Fund, publicly endorsed Wallace for Congress, saying his support for their cause is “exactly the kind of dedication we need in Congress.”

Wallace’s fund also gave $20,000 in 2010 to the Center for the Advancement of the Steady State Economy (CASSE), a group that sees the economic growth as undesirable and instead supports an economy with ‘stable or mildly fluctuating levels’ and a society where birth rates equal death rates.

The organization openly supports zero population growth and its executive board member, Herman Daly, advocated issuing reproduction licenses, allowing women to have only two children unless they buy the license for more children from other women. Daly called it the ‘best plan yet offered’ to limit population growth.”

The group advocates strongly for abortion and along with taxing families “to the hilt” for having more than two children, as noted in a Yale Law School publication about the “voices that shaped the abortion debate before the Roe v. Wade Supreme Court’s ruling.”

The group advocates that –

  1. That no responsible family should have more than two children. Any family wanting to care for more than two children should adopt further children. Adopting children does not increase the population.
  2. All methods of birth control, including legalized abortion, should be freely available—and at no cost in poverty cases.
  3. Irresponsible people who have more than two children should be taxed to the hilt for the privilege of irresponsible breeding.

Fox News continued:

Zoe Wilson-Meyer, communications director for Wallace’s campaign, didn’t answer Fox News’ questions on whether Wallace still supports the ideas expressed by the groups.

“The Wallace Global Fund has for decades been a leader in helping women gain access to family planning. Former Co-Chair Scott Wallace is proud of the work of grantees like Planned Parenthood in empowering women and protecting reproductive rights and will stand up for Pennsylvania women,” she said in an email.

“In Washington, Brian Fitzpatrick voted to defund Planned Parenthood and supports Donald Trump’s effort to take away a woman’s right to choose,” she added.

Largely reminiscent of Nazi Germany who exercised eugenics to its full and most horrific potential, this policy of so-called “irresponsible breeders” also resembles the one-child policy from China that saw forced abortions or other forced invasive birth control procedures. Yet eugenics practices had their roots in America as well. American newspapers frequently offered praise for eugenics just prior to WWII and The Holocaust …. that is until Adolf Hitler revealed the true horrors of what eugenics really looked like. They avoided the subject for decades thereafter.

Nine out of ten eugenicists in the 20th Century were also Progressives or Socialists, and the most central component to the eugenic creed is the desire to engineer and centrally plan human reproduction, weeding out the unwanted or undesirable, according to a report on eugenics by PBS.

Yet where does that end? Who determines who is undesirable? Is it the unborn child conceived at an inconvenient time? The elderly mother? The child with cerebral palsy? Those with PTSD? Autism? Blue eyes? White skin? You cannot get to genocide without first visiting identity politics and they say the propagandist’s job is to effectively make the people forget his “enemy” is, in fact, a human being just as he is. It seems we never really do learn from history, do we?

Continue Reading

News

Trump Issued Major Warning: ‘We Will Look Into Discriminatory and Illegal Practice’ – It’s On!

Huge problems and everyone needs to know!

Published

on

President Donald Trump voiced his concerns over “discriminatory and illegal practice” when he posted about the alleged controversy going on with Republicans being censored on Twitter. The tactic is sometimes referred to as “shadow banning” and it seems to be a strategy that social media platforms use to limit the visibility of some people. For example, ever wonder why someone who is genuinely popular might have tons of followers but their posts don’t seem to get many responses? It could be one of several reasons. Either they have fake followers, the post is no good, or they are being censored. In many cases, it’s a form of censorship that’s the obvious result. When a social media user goes from getting a lot of replies and views on their posts, then all of a sudden there’s very little replies and it seems like no one has seen the post – then they were hit with that form of censorship or suppression.

Social media platforms such as Twitter and Facebook have been called out for suppressing the content of certain Republican voices or those who support President Donald Trump. Well-known stars like Diamond and Silk have made it very public that they feel targeted for the views and opinions on their pages. That’s just the tip of the iceberg because the problem spans from targeting well-known mainstream people all the way down to the independent publishers. Censorship like this is affecting people’s careers and causing an unbalanced platform in which people with certain views are being limited. It might not be listed as a “ban” but it’s certainly limiting the viewership of certain people. The content that would once appear in people’s feed or timeline now requires a fine-tooth comb to find and it seems like people are realizing this more often and being upset with it.

Trump spoke about it on Twitter and Vice News completed a report on it.

Vice News reported: “Twitter is limiting the visibility of prominent Republicans in search results — a technique known as “shadow banning” — in what it says is a side effect of its attempts to improve the quality of discourse on the platform.

The Republican Party chair Ronna McDaniel, several conservative Republican congressmen, and Donald Trump Jr.’s spokesman no longer appear in the auto-populated drop-down search box on Twitter, VICE News has learned. It’s a shift that diminishes their reach on the platform — and it’s the same one being deployed against prominent racists to limit their visibility. The profiles continue to appear when conducting a full search, but not in the more convenient and visible drop-down bar. (The accounts appear to also populate if you already follow the person.)

Democrats are not being “shadow banned” in the same way, according to a VICE News review. McDaniel’s counterpart, Democratic Party chair Tom Perez, and liberal members of Congress — including Reps. Maxine Waters, Joe Kennedy III, Keith Ellison, and Mark Pocan — all continue to appear in drop-down search results. Not a single member of the 78-person Progressive Caucus faces the same situation in Twitter’s search.

“The notion that social media companies would suppress certain political points of view should concern every American,” McDaniel told VICE News in a statement. “Twitter owes the public answers to what’s really going on.”

Presented with screenshots of the searches, a Twitter spokesperson told VICE News: “We are aware that some accounts are not automatically populating in our search box and shipping a change to address this.” Asked why only conservative Republicans appear to be affected and not liberal Democrats, the spokesperson wrote: “I’d emphasize that our technology is based on account *behavior* not the content of Tweets.”

Twitter directed VICE News to a May 15 blog post that explained the company’s new approach to combating “troll-like behaviors.” After making changes to its platform, the company said that “[t]he result is that people contributing to the healthy conversation will be more visible in conversations and search.”

Twitter did not respond to a follow-up question.

Twitter’s troll hunt, however, has ensnared some of the most prominent Republicans in the country. Type in the names of McDaniel, conservative members of Congress like Reps. Mark Meadows, Jim Jordan, and Matt Gaetz, and Trump Jr.’s spokesman Andrew Surabian, for example, and Twitter’s drop-down search bar does not show their profiles. The search menu also does not display the verified profile of Rep. Devin Nunes of California, only his unverified one that he seldom uses to post.

That limits their visibility and the ease of finding their profiles compared to their liberal counterparts.

UPDATE: July 26, 10:00 AM: Twitter appears to have adjusted its platform overnight to no longer limit the visibility of some prominent Republicans in its search results.”

At what point do social media platforms give the control back to the people? Users should not have to worry about their views being censored by the machine.

Censoring any content that is not illegal should not be tolerated by the users.

Continue Reading

Like Us on Facebook

Recent

Trending

No trending posts found at this time.