Connect with us

News

Sarah Huckabee Sanders Just Shocked Everyone With 9-Year-Old Bombshell on Trump

In the midst of all the drama that is going on today, it would do us a wonder of good to take time to appreciate the little things.

Published

on

In the midst of all the drama that is going on today, it would do us a wonder of good to take time to appreciate the little things… the good things that go on around us. One such memorable incident happened last summer and it still makes me smile every time I think of it. I bet it will make you feel good as well.

DC can be a very ugly place. But it is also a place where warriors fight for us every day. A giant among them is President Trump who has fought the establishment politicians every step of the way. But even there, life-affirming and uplifting things warm our hearts. White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders moved all of America when she read a 9 year-old’s letter to President Trump to the press corps assembled at the White House.

Sarah said it was a moment to remember the “forgotten men, women, and children that we’re here to serve and that the President is fighting for.” And it was. It reminds each of us that we all matter and the biggest truths many times come out of the smallest of Americans, our children. According to the Washington Times, the letter came from a young man named Dylan. However, he notes that “every body calls me Pickle.” I love that nickname and it hearkens back to a much simpler time. It looks like Trump has a devoted new friend.

Trending: Elected Democrat Official Who Viciously Attacked Veteran Just Learned Her Fate

In the letter that was dated June 1st, the little boy calls Trump his favorite President and says he had a Trump-themed birthday party. “My cake was in the (shape) of your hat,” he said. He was referring to Trump’s signature red “Make America Great Again” cap. Dylan also had a list of questions for President Trump which Sarah read.

“How old are you? How big is the White House? Ho(w) much monny (sic) do you have?” the letter cheerfully read. Ah, the innocence of children. The left asks that question so they can examine Trump’s tax returns and bank accounts. Dylan asks it so he can become great like his President. “I don’t now why people don’t like you,” he continued. Sanders responded, “Me either, Dylan.” I think most of us felt that way when we heard this letter and we still feel that way. “You seme nice can we be friends?” he concluded, while noting he’d included his picture. He’s a cute kid by the way.

Sanders at the time said that she hoped that Dylan was watching at home “because the President wanted me to personally tell you hello.” “Dylan, thanks for writing to the President,” Sanders said. “And if you’re ever in Washington, D.C., I hope you’ll stop by and let us show you around the White House.” And Dylan did go to the White House which is in itself another story.

The touching letter went viral. Americans couldn’t get enough of it. They are starved for good, clean innocent patriotism. The San Diego Union-Tribune entitled its article on the incident, “Everyone’s talking about Dylan, age 9. Donald Trump is his ‘favrit president.’” It wasn’t just an adorable moment, it showed that the White House press room was going to be a lot different under Sarah Huckabee Sanders. And boy has it. Sanders is a tigress and has handled every confrontation from the lamestream media with grace and aplomb. Regardless of whether they attack her looks, her speech or her morals. She’s a devout Christian, a devoted mother and the best press secretary I think we have ever had.

The media hates to cover stuff like this because it makes President Trump look good. In fact, they go out of their way to bury press like this. They would rather focus on soap opera drama and all-things Russian (except the ones that actually matter). Anything that makes the President look bad or inept is what they strive for. But Americans no longer buy that crap. They love their President and equally hate the media these days. And one little boy named Pickle certainly loves President Trump. The media should take notes and a lesson from this kid.

Appearing on Fox and Friends, Dylan’s mother, SuAnn Harbin, said the pair would “definitely” take the White House up on its offer to have them tour Trump’s residence. Their television appearance dismissed suspicions held by some that Dylan, nicknamed “Pickle,” was not real and that the letter had been faked. “Theres no way a 9 year old boy wrote that. I work with kids and any kid who is called Pickle and wants to be buddies with Trump aint real,” a social media user wrote on Twitter. That’s a typical leftist response and it was pushed by the Washington Post. No big surprise there.

Dylan told Fox News anchors that he wrote the President “because I wanted him to be my friend.” His mother said she had not influenced her son. “It was all him. He did everything,” she said. SuAnn said her son is “so excited” that the White House responded to the letter. She also added that they received little warning before Sanders read the letter publicly.

“It was a complete surprise. We were at a Giants game and they had called right before we went in to the stadium and they said, ‘Hi, this is so and so from the White House and we’re calling to let you know that we received Pickle’s letter and that they’re going to read it at the press conference in about 20 minutes,'” she told Fox News. When asked why he admires Trump, Dylan said, “Because he’s a smart businessman and I like all of his suits.”

Pickle did get his tour and he got to meet President Trump from what I understand. And the only propaganda here is what came from the left and the media which no one, and I mean no one, listened to.

Join the conversation

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

News

Dem Candidate Pushing ‘Irresponsible Breeder’ Tax On Certain Parents Because Of ‘Privilege’

Published

on

Scott Wallace is a multimillionaire running in Pennsylvania’s 1st Congressional District against current incumbent Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (PA-R). Considered an elite, even amongst the wealthy, he boasts a net worth of between $127 million and $309 million, according to his financial disclosure statement. This would make him the third-richest member of Congress if he were elected to the House today.

From a hardline leftist pedigree, his grandfather was Henry Wallace, the “New Deal visionary” and one-time vice president under former President Franklin D. Roosevelt. His wealth is inherited, stemming from a seed company his grandfather founded that was purchased by DuPont for $10 billion in the 1990s, along with a large number of stocks with the largest being DowDuPont.

His campaign is largely self funded with Wallace claiming he is “putting a significant amount of my own assets into this because this is the most important thing I can imagine doing for America at this point in my life — this is a very expensive district to run in, but it is crucial in the Democrats’ efforts to retake the House.”

But just why this is so incredibly important to Wallace goes beyond the typical party lines of Republican and Democrat. Receiving endorsements from both Planned Parenthood and the National Organization for Women (NOW), Wallace is a population control zealot who believes families who choose to have more than two children are “irresponsible breeders” and should be taxed. Wallace has donated nearly $7 million dollars to various population control groups over the past 20 years, with the majority going through his own Wallace Global Fund.  In addition to its efforts towards population control, the foundation has also reportedly donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to anti-Israel groups that support a boycott of the Jewish State.

Fox News reports:

“Zero Population Growth (ZPG) was among the organizations that received the money from the fund. According to public records, it received $420,000 between 1997 and 2003.

The group, shortly after being founded in 1968, released a brochure advocating abortion to stabilize population growth and claimed that “no responsible family should have more than two children.” To deal with larger families, it also called for families to be “taxed to the hilt” for “irresponsible breeding.”

It also blamed the overpopulation on the ‘white middle-class’ that ‘use up more than their share of resources and do more than their share of polluting‘ and urged them to ‘voluntarily limit their families to two children.’

Paul Ehrlich, who co-founded the ZPG, once called abortion “a highly effective weapon in the armory of population control.” The goal of the organization, which changed its name to Population Connection in 2002, has remained the same since its inception, arguing that the world needs to contain population growth with particular emphasis on American families.

The organization’s political arm, Population Connection Action Fund, publicly endorsed Wallace for Congress, saying his support for their cause is “exactly the kind of dedication we need in Congress.”

Wallace’s fund also gave $20,000 in 2010 to the Center for the Advancement of the Steady State Economy (CASSE), a group that sees the economic growth as undesirable and instead supports an economy with ‘stable or mildly fluctuating levels’ and a society where birth rates equal death rates.

The organization openly supports zero population growth and its executive board member, Herman Daly, advocated issuing reproduction licenses, allowing women to have only two children unless they buy the license for more children from other women. Daly called it the ‘best plan yet offered’ to limit population growth.”

The group advocates strongly for abortion and along with taxing families “to the hilt” for having more than two children, as noted in a Yale Law School publication about the “voices that shaped the abortion debate before the Roe v. Wade Supreme Court’s ruling.”

The group advocates that –

  1. That no responsible family should have more than two children. Any family wanting to care for more than two children should adopt further children. Adopting children does not increase the population.
  2. All methods of birth control, including legalized abortion, should be freely available—and at no cost in poverty cases.
  3. Irresponsible people who have more than two children should be taxed to the hilt for the privilege of irresponsible breeding.

Fox News continued:

Zoe Wilson-Meyer, communications director for Wallace’s campaign, didn’t answer Fox News’ questions on whether Wallace still supports the ideas expressed by the groups.

“The Wallace Global Fund has for decades been a leader in helping women gain access to family planning. Former Co-Chair Scott Wallace is proud of the work of grantees like Planned Parenthood in empowering women and protecting reproductive rights and will stand up for Pennsylvania women,” she said in an email.

“In Washington, Brian Fitzpatrick voted to defund Planned Parenthood and supports Donald Trump’s effort to take away a woman’s right to choose,” she added.

Largely reminiscent of Nazi Germany who exercised eugenics to its full and most horrific potential, this policy of so-called “irresponsible breeders” also resembles the one-child policy from China that saw forced abortions or other forced invasive birth control procedures. Yet eugenics practices had their roots in America as well. American newspapers frequently offered praise for eugenics just prior to WWII and The Holocaust …. that is until Adolf Hitler revealed the true horrors of what eugenics really looked like. They avoided the subject for decades thereafter.

Nine out of ten eugenicists in the 20th Century were also Progressives or Socialists, and the most central component to the eugenic creed is the desire to engineer and centrally plan human reproduction, weeding out the unwanted or undesirable, according to a report on eugenics by PBS.

Yet where does that end? Who determines who is undesirable? Is it the unborn child conceived at an inconvenient time? The elderly mother? The child with cerebral palsy? Those with PTSD? Autism? Blue eyes? White skin? You cannot get to genocide without first visiting identity politics and they say the propagandist’s job is to effectively make the people forget his “enemy” is, in fact, a human being just as he is. It seems we never really do learn from history, do we?

Continue Reading

News

Trump Issued Major Warning: ‘We Will Look Into Discriminatory and Illegal Practice’ – It’s On!

Huge problems and everyone needs to know!

Published

on

President Donald Trump voiced his concerns over “discriminatory and illegal practice” when he posted about the alleged controversy going on with Republicans being censored on Twitter. The tactic is sometimes referred to as “shadow banning” and it seems to be a strategy that social media platforms use to limit the visibility of some people. For example, ever wonder why someone who is genuinely popular might have tons of followers but their posts don’t seem to get many responses? It could be one of several reasons. Either they have fake followers, the post is no good, or they are being censored. In many cases, it’s a form of censorship that’s the obvious result. When a social media user goes from getting a lot of replies and views on their posts, then all of a sudden there’s very little replies and it seems like no one has seen the post – then they were hit with that form of censorship or suppression.

Social media platforms such as Twitter and Facebook have been called out for suppressing the content of certain Republican voices or those who support President Donald Trump. Well-known stars like Diamond and Silk have made it very public that they feel targeted for the views and opinions on their pages. That’s just the tip of the iceberg because the problem spans from targeting well-known mainstream people all the way down to the independent publishers. Censorship like this is affecting people’s careers and causing an unbalanced platform in which people with certain views are being limited. It might not be listed as a “ban” but it’s certainly limiting the viewership of certain people. The content that would once appear in people’s feed or timeline now requires a fine-tooth comb to find and it seems like people are realizing this more often and being upset with it.

Trump spoke about it on Twitter and Vice News completed a report on it.

Vice News reported: “Twitter is limiting the visibility of prominent Republicans in search results — a technique known as “shadow banning” — in what it says is a side effect of its attempts to improve the quality of discourse on the platform.

The Republican Party chair Ronna McDaniel, several conservative Republican congressmen, and Donald Trump Jr.’s spokesman no longer appear in the auto-populated drop-down search box on Twitter, VICE News has learned. It’s a shift that diminishes their reach on the platform — and it’s the same one being deployed against prominent racists to limit their visibility. The profiles continue to appear when conducting a full search, but not in the more convenient and visible drop-down bar. (The accounts appear to also populate if you already follow the person.)

Democrats are not being “shadow banned” in the same way, according to a VICE News review. McDaniel’s counterpart, Democratic Party chair Tom Perez, and liberal members of Congress — including Reps. Maxine Waters, Joe Kennedy III, Keith Ellison, and Mark Pocan — all continue to appear in drop-down search results. Not a single member of the 78-person Progressive Caucus faces the same situation in Twitter’s search.

“The notion that social media companies would suppress certain political points of view should concern every American,” McDaniel told VICE News in a statement. “Twitter owes the public answers to what’s really going on.”

Presented with screenshots of the searches, a Twitter spokesperson told VICE News: “We are aware that some accounts are not automatically populating in our search box and shipping a change to address this.” Asked why only conservative Republicans appear to be affected and not liberal Democrats, the spokesperson wrote: “I’d emphasize that our technology is based on account *behavior* not the content of Tweets.”

Twitter directed VICE News to a May 15 blog post that explained the company’s new approach to combating “troll-like behaviors.” After making changes to its platform, the company said that “[t]he result is that people contributing to the healthy conversation will be more visible in conversations and search.”

Twitter did not respond to a follow-up question.

Twitter’s troll hunt, however, has ensnared some of the most prominent Republicans in the country. Type in the names of McDaniel, conservative members of Congress like Reps. Mark Meadows, Jim Jordan, and Matt Gaetz, and Trump Jr.’s spokesman Andrew Surabian, for example, and Twitter’s drop-down search bar does not show their profiles. The search menu also does not display the verified profile of Rep. Devin Nunes of California, only his unverified one that he seldom uses to post.

That limits their visibility and the ease of finding their profiles compared to their liberal counterparts.

UPDATE: July 26, 10:00 AM: Twitter appears to have adjusted its platform overnight to no longer limit the visibility of some prominent Republicans in its search results.”

At what point do social media platforms give the control back to the people? Users should not have to worry about their views being censored by the machine.

Censoring any content that is not illegal should not be tolerated by the users.

Continue Reading

Like Us on Facebook

Recent

Trending

No trending posts found at this time.