Connect with us


This Is The Newly Leaked Starbucks ‘Holiday’ Cup That has a DISGUSTING Secret Message On It



It’s been a bad year for the world’s largest coffee franchise who mixed business with politics and made a series of unfortunate decisions that infuriated even their most loyal daily customers. What began with a promise to go against President Donald Trump’s immigration plan by hiring thousands of Muslim refugees, instead of actual Americans looking for a job, ended up with the worst public relations debacle on the planet when actual feces was found in their drinks – presumed to be from unclean customs in Islam. Now, the coffee giant is ending what’s probably their worst year in business, by going out on “bang” after debuting their holiday cup with a disgusting secret message on it. This can only end in a massive loss of revenue with a huge “f-you” to our president and everyone who supports him.

Liberals love to hijack the Christmas season by changing everything about the real reason for the season to meet their sensitivities. President Trump has changed all that this year in a major way by making a long-overdue declaration that here in America we’re going to say “Merry Christmas” again. This is a major problem for lefties who don’t want to see “Christ” in Christmas or for attention to be taken off their agenda. That’s where the new Starbucks holiday cup comes in to secretly stick it to every Christian celebrating Christ’s birth.

Fox News reports:

Starbuck’s newest holiday cups are getting second looks after a Buzzfeed article suggested that they might be “gay.”

The cups feature a busy print of holiday favorites like mittens, presents and Christmas trees, and above the logo, two unseen people are holding hands.

Since the cups launched in October, however, people have taken to Twitter with hypotheses that the androgynous hands may belong to a pair of lesbians.

The idea may have sprung up from a video campaign Starbucks launched, advertising the return of the holiday cups. In the video, two women are seen standing at a table holding hands. The campaign claims, “The holidays mean something different for everyone.”

Many Twitter users seen to have jumped to the same conclusion about the hands, with one person writing, “We’re loving @Starbucks’ new festive ad with a lesbian couple.”

Another wrote, “Great new #christmas campaign from @Starbucks featuring #lesbian couple on the Holiday Cup.”

Critics, meanwhile, are also responding to new hypotheses about the cup, with one on Twitter writing, “The new Starbucks cup has lesbian couple on it. Rom 1:26 ‘because of this, God gave them over to shameful lust’…”

Another called for a boycott, saying, “This Year’s Starbucks Holiday Campaign Features a Lesbian Couple,” followed by the hashtag #BoycottStarbucks.

Starbucks has not confirmed the legitimacy of these suspicions, but did respond positively to a tweet applauding them on their “Christmas campaign … featuring lesbians.”

Despite not owning up to their questionable design that leaves a lot up to interpretation, the company is still defending putting political messages on their Christmas (holiday) cups. In a statement about the purpose of the annual cups, Starbucks claims that they’re just trying to encourage the “spirit of the season.” It’s a nice excuse for their hidden agenda since nothing says “’tis the season” like divisive politics.

“Each year during the holidays we aim to bring our customers an experience that inspires the spirit of the season, and we will continue to embrace and welcome customers from all backgrounds and religions in our stores around the world,” the statement reads.

This isn’t the first time that Starbucks has divided the country with their holiday cup and ruined a perfectly cheerful season with their controversial social statement. They lost a lot of customers last year after rolling out the green cup which sparked nationwide outrage. “One week before Election Day, Starbucks has unveiled a new cup in the U.S. that it says is meant to be ‘a symbol of unity,’ Chicago Tribune reported. “The green cup features a mosaic of more than 100 people, including a coffee farmer and barista.”

“Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz calls it “a divisive time in our country” and says in a statement that the coffee giant wanted to come up with a symbol to serve ‘as a reminder of our shared values,'” the Tribune explained.

If Starbucks really wants to bring people together during this special time of year, they would put politics aside and simply stick to non-denominational images and messages on their cups. The company should really be more focused on what’s going in the cup, in that it doesn’t have traces of feces, rather than what’s on the outside of the cup. However, as long as they are making new winter designs, an appropriate picture they could have used would be a snowflake sine it’s on par with the season and it befitting of the company’s liberal image.

Join the conversation

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Frank Lea





President Trump dropped a major bomb on the heads of two people significant to the Democrat party. He blasted them on Twitter with an explosive Tweet that called for the shocking arrest of the top democratic nominee for President and her number one sidekick. Trump lambasted them with a barrage of words in the 280 Twitter limit and in that very brief message he called for Hillary Clinton and Huma Abedin to be jailed.

Among scandals, investigations, and outlets like Wikileaks releasing information not previously seen by the public, it’s no wonder the pair has found them in the spotlight of Trump’s vicious Twitter account. When Trump isn’t reminding Kim Jong-un that America will nuke the daylights out of them if they ever attack the United States, then Trump is calling out his foes left and right. He’s delivering knockout blows to everyone like he’s an undefeated Glass Joe in Mike Tyson’s punch out. Or better yet, Trump is to Twitter, what Mike Tyson was to boxing when he decimated opponents in very short boxing matches. They weren’t matches, they were a massacre, and that’s what Trump does to people.

Now we hear about Hillary Clinton making various headlines. We read about boxes of “Muslim files” being removed from the White House. We witness a house fire at Clinton’s house, and immediately people say things like “what files did she accidentally leave in the room that caught fire,” and there’s just so much information swirling together about Clinton. People wonder if Trump will be the one who puts her behind bars. If he does, then what will the retaliation be?

Freedom Daily reported:
President Trump made a shocking post on social media, where he formally called for the immediate arrest of both Hillary Clinton and her Muslim Brotherhood sidekick, Huma Abedin. Over the past several weeks, both women’s scandalous antics have been making headlines, after news broke of how the pair removed 5 boxes of “Muslim files” from the White House to cover Obama’s dirty secrets, where the deed was accomplished after they falsely claimed that the box contained “unclassified personal materials.” Now just 24 hours after President Trump called for their arrest, Wikileaks has just dropped another bombshell, and now news of Guantanamo being prepared for “VIP American detainees” is making many speculate that Trump is about to make good on his campaign promise to “lock her up.”

It gets deeper. Wikileaks looks over the neighborly fence like Wilson from Home Improvement. They whispered over the fence about some more damning information that could put another dent in her career. The Gateway Pundit stopped by to expose the New York Times for collusion with Hillary Clinton in a scathing attempt to conceal scandals. This was done by allegedly notifying Clinton of the stories they would run in advance, that way Clinton could prepare her response if a “spin” was needed.

Gateway Pundit reported:
“Wikileaks revealed in a midnight tweet late Saturday into Sunday that a New York Times reporter used to email the State Department giving them updates on stories they would be running several days in advance.

Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State at the time. This would give her State Department enough to time to distract or put a spin on the new revelations.

“Email shows New York Times handed over Cablegate’s publication schedule to the US government (without telling @WikiLeaks) giving the State Department, then headed by Hillary Clinton, up to 9 days in advance to spin the revelations or create diversions,” Wikileaks tweeted.”

WikiLeaks is the one guy at school who just didn’t care. They called it as they saw it, unafraid of consequences, and brave enough to say it like it is.

Tom Fitton is also like that. He’s the President of Judicial Watch. He made a strong statement against Hillary and Huma Abedin.

“We already know the Obama State Department let Hillary Clinton steal and then delete her government emails, which included classified information. But these new records show that was only part of the scandal. These new documents show the Obama State Department had a deal with Hillary Clinton to hide her calls logs and schedules, which would be contrary to FOIA and other laws. When are the American people going to get an honest investigation of the Clinton crimes?”

He’s calling for a more honest investigation. Although, with that house fire that just happened in the Clinton Compound, then it’s easy to wonder if that fire was set on purpose and information destroyed. Then again, it doesn’t make sense to destroy information in their own home. They could have something destroyed without a trace if they wanted to do so. It’s Hillary, she can pull those things off and people know this. Maybe the fact that they see this is why so many investigators are hesitant to truly find anything.

Are investigators scared to crack open a hard shell full of evidence?

Is Trump the President who will hold Hillary and Huma’s hands as they’re walked into prison?

What happens next?

FOLLOW us on Facebook at mPolitical!

Continue Reading

Matt Palumbo






You probably didn’t see it in the mainstream media but among the executive orders signed by Donald Trump recently declared a national emergency. The executive order, addressed to Congress, states that pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, he’s declaring a national emergency with respect to “the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States posed by serious human rights abuse and corruption around the world.” In other words, the act is targeting international human rights abusers.

Given the timing of this order and the recent drama with the United Nations, which overwhelmingly passed a resolution dissenting from Trump’s declaration of Jerusalem of the capital of Israel, it’s apparently directed at many of those countries. It’s clear that they’ve gone unchecked thus far – and one should not look further than their treatment of Israel to prove as much. According to Unbiased America, in 2016, the U.N. general assembly passed five times more resolutions against Israel than against North Korea, Syria, Russia, Iran, and the rest of world combined.

The executive order reads:


Pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, as amended (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (IEEPA), I hereby report that I have issued the enclosed Executive Order (the “order”) declaring a national emergency with respect to the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States posed by serious human rights abuse and corruption around the world. In addition to taking action under IEEPA, the order implements the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act (Public Law 114-328) (the “Act”) and delegates certain of its authorities.

The order blocks the property and interests in property of persons listed in the Annex to the order. It also blocks the property and interests in property of any foreign person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General:

(1) to be responsible for or complicit in, or to have directly or indirectly engaged in, serious human rights abuse;

(2) to be a current or former government official, or a person acting for or on behalf of such an official, who is responsible for or complicit in, or has directly or indirectly engaged in:

(a) corruption, including the misappropriation of state assets, the expropriation of private assets for personal gain, corruption related to government contracts or the extraction of natural resources, or bribery; or

(b) the transfer or the facilitation of the transfer of the proceeds of corruption;

(3) to be or have been a leader or official of:

(a) an entity, including any government entity, that has engaged in, or whose members have engaged in, any of the activities described in (1), (2)(a), or (2)(b) above relating to the leader’s or official’s tenure; or

(b) an entity whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to the order as a result of activities related to the leader’s or the official’s tenure; or

(4) to have attempted to engage in any of the activities described in (1), (2)(a), or (2)(b) above.

The order also blocks any person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General:

(5) to have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services to or in support of:

(a) any activity described in (1), (2)(a), or (2)(b) above that is conducted by a foreign person;

(b) any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to the order; or

(c) any entity described in (3)(a) above where the activity is conducted by a foreign person;

(6) to be owned or controlled by, or to have acted or purported to act for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to the order; or

(7) to have attempted to engage in any of the activities described in (5) or (6) above.

In addition, the order suspends entry into the United States of any alien listed in the Annex or determined to meet one or more of the criteria above.

I have delegated to the Secretary of the Treasury the authority, in consultation with the Secretary of State, to take such actions, including adopting rules and regulations, and to employ all powers granted to the President by IEEPA and the Act, as may be necessary to implement the order and relevant provisions of the Act. I have delegated to the Secretary of State the authority to take such actions, including adopting rules and regulations, and to employ all powers granted to the President by IEEPA and the Act, as may be necessary to implement the provisions of the order and the Act suspending entry into the United States of certain aliens. All executive departments and agencies are directed to take all appropriate measures within their authority to implement the order.


December 20, 2017.

According to Freedom Daily, the executive order is directed against some specific individuals. Among them include an Israeli billionaire, the head of Nicaragua’s electoral commission, and the former president of Gambia.They are:

1. Mukhtar Hamid Shah; Date of Birth (DOB) August 11, 1939; alt. DOB November 8, 1939; nationality, Pakistan

2. Angel Rondon Rijo; DOB July 16, 1950; nationality, Dominican Republic

3. Dan Gertler; DOB December 23, 1973; nationality, Israel; alt. nationality, Democratic Republic of the Congo

4. Maung Maung Soe; DOB March 1964; nationality, Burma

5. Yahya Jammeh; DOB May 25, 1965; nationality, The Gambia

6. Sergey Kusiuk; DOB December 1, 1966; nationality, Ukraine; alt. nationality, Russia

7. Benjamin Bol Mel; DOB January 3, 1978; alt. DOB December 24, 1978; nationality, South Sudan; alt. nationality, Sudan

8. Julio Antonio Juárez Ramírez; DOB December 1, 1980; nationality, Guatemala

9. Goulnora Islamovna Karimova; DOB July 8, 1972; nationality, Uzbekistan

10. Slobodan Tesic; DOB December 21, 1958; nationality, Serbia

11. Artem Yuryevich Chayka; DOB September 25, 1975; nationality, Russia

12. Gao Yan; DOB April 1963; nationality, China

13. Roberto Jose Rivas Reyes; DOB July 6, 1954; nationality, Nicaragua

How will the United Nations respond? Will they ignore real problems do things that matter?

FOLLOW us on Facebook at mPolitical!

Continue Reading

Frank Lea





A sickly number of sexually related assault charges has struck California so hard that people are resigning like lemmings walking off a cliff. One by one their career ends, and they walk off the cliff of employment. There they go, down into the hole of obscurity. Or prison. Some of the recently resigned might find themselves in jail over what they did, and Nancy Pelosi is no different. She’s recently gone off the hinges as well, which is par the norm for her daily activity, but this could be the massive scandal that explodes and destroys much of the Democratic party from the inside out.

Democrats found themselves buried up to their necks in accusations and drowning in their misery. It’s bad. The levels of trust with the public have dwindled down to barely anything. It’s like when parents teach young kids about “stranger danger,” and the Democrats are big-time strangers as they’re being called out for their alleged involvement in some disturbing behaviors.

Daily Wire reported:
“This whole issue has hit a critical mass in a very short time. I’ve never seen anything like it before — and I don’t know where it ends.”

South and others claim that Democrats have suffered from a severe decline in public trust. The Hollywood leftists who have bankrolled Democratic candidates at both the state and federal level are now under scrutiny, as Harvey Weinstein, perhaps chief among the entertainment industry’s political powerhouses, is facing dozens of sexual harassment, sexual assault, and rape allegations — and, quite possibly, an indictment.

The major Democratic players who represent some of California’s biggest urban areas can’t escape the tarnish. Even Rep. Nancy Pelosi isn’t immune, the article claims, because she stalled Rep. John Conyers’s resignation, calling Conyers an “American icon” and pleading with him to remain in office, even as more women came forward to accuse Conyers of bizarre — and often sexual — behavior.

So many Hollywood leftists were accused of sexual assault, sexual harassment, and even rape. That doesn’t look good for the Democrat party that the celebrity elites often standby. All those words speaking out from the #MeToo has been more like one big finger pointing at Democrats as they continuously get tossed under the rolling wheels of sexually charged crime allegations.

People like Nancy Pelosi are no different. She stood up for John Conyers and stalled his resignation as he faced his accusations that could end his career. With Pelosi supporting him, does that mean she knew of his alleged behavior from the past, and she was OK with it because it wasn’t directed towards her? Did she know about any of this and keep it secret?

All that finger pointing by Hollywood elites telling people how to behave and they were the ones misbehaving. It’s funny that we witnessed so many of the Democrats tell people what to do, or not to do, and they were the people perpetrating crimes on innocent victims.

The California Assembly is itself embroiled in its own sex scandal. Dozens of women signed a petition to demand accountability from Democratic legislators they claim have sexually harassed aides and staff. They even have their own movement: #WeSaidEnough.

The Assembly plans to hold hours of hearings dedicated to sexual harassment within its ranks when it reconvenes in January, and the State Senate has hired two separate law firms, Politico reports, to handle what leadership believes will be a wave of claims. Nancy Pelosi’s daughter, Alexandra, is leading a group of progressive feminists attacking California state Democrats from the left, accusing them of covering up for abusers in their ranks while labeling themselves great protectors of women’s rights.

Democrats have yet to see electoral fallout from D.C. and Hollywood scandals, but Politico seems convinced that, at least in California, certain seats are likely to remain vacant or even flip to Republican if state-based scandals make national headlines. Californians prefer Democrats, that’s not in doubt, but they may want a change of pace from their regular representation.

What’s next for Nancy Pelosi and the big wigs of the Democrat party? The Hollywood scandal is massive and there are so many accusations that it would take a room full of people to compile a complete list. There are so many Democrats wrapped up in criminal activity who are being supported by people like Nancy Pelosi, and people have to wonder how far down the hole she’s going with them.

Is Nancy Pelosi, and her support for the accused people like John Conyers, the next to fall?

FOLLOW us on Facebook at mPolitical!

Continue Reading

Like Us on Facebook



No trending posts found at this time.

Trending Now