Connect with us


Nasty Mob Gets What They Deserve At Huge SCOTUS Protest Once Female Reporter Shows Up

Oh no you don’t!



Predictably the leftist progressives are losing their collective minds following President Donald Trump’s announcement of Brett Kavanaugh as his Supreme Court nominee to replace the retiring Justice Anthony Kennedy.

Following President Trump’s announcement that Kavanaugh would be President Trump’s choice to replace Kennedy, dozens of people began to gather at Trump Tower located in New York City’s Midtown area. The prevailing concern was that Kavanaugh would set the country back decades. Much of that fear is directed at the leftist fear-mongering campaign that took place upon the announcement of Kennedy’s retirement and the claims that President Trump’s newest Supreme Court pick would overturn the controversial Roe v. Wade decision from 1973 legalizing abortion.

What is shocking is the sheer vitriol behind the response including those in leadership in their response. Seven people, including a city council member, have been arrested for civil disobedience during protests that raged out of control on Monday night.

The protest began peacefully with people marching along the sidewalk chanting “Hey hey ho ho, Trump’s nominee has got to go!” Then things got ugly when a group of protesters chose to sit in the middle of Fifth Avenue near the intersection of 57th Street blocking heavy traffic. The NYPD was forced to begin arresting protesters and among them was City Councilman Jumaane Williams.

Trending: Patriots Former Tight End Martellus Bennett Just Made Sickening Allegation About Trump

The protests were not confined to New York City either. Protesters were present in cities across the country in opposition to all things Trump, including our nation’s capital – Washington D.C. – where many protesters gathered on the steps of the Supreme Court itself to express their displeasure at President Trump’s choice of Kavanaugh.

The anger of the mob forced Fox News reporter Shannon Bream to flee her live reporting station in front of the court for the safety of the nearby Fox studio. Bream originally planned to host a live show on the steps of the Supreme Court but was forced to move the broadcast for her own personal safety.

Bream tweeted of the volatile atmosphere – “Literally had to bail on our live show from #SCOTUS. Moving the show back to the safety of the studio. See y’all at 11p @FoxNews. Very few times I’ve felt threatened while out in the field. The mood here tonight is very volatile. Law enforcement appears to be closing down 1st Street in front of SCOTUS.”

Also among the protesters was Senator Bernie Sanders (VT-I), current senator of Vermont, former Presidential Candidate for the Democratic party, and self-professed socialist. Sanders was stirring up the crowd, inciting further discord regarding the Roe v. Wade decision, telling protesters they should be ready to challenge the nomination.

Sanders yelled at the crowd of protesters – “Are you ready for a fight? Are you ready to defend Roe vs. Wade? This is a tough fight but it is a fight that we can win. We have the American people on our side, now we have to go state by state by state to make sure senators do what their constituents want.”

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (NY-D) is another Democrat leading the charge in an effort to obstruct Kavanaugh’s appointment to the bench. Shortly after the announcement was made, Schumer tweeted – “I will oppose Judge Kavanaugh’s nomination with everything I have. Judge Kavanaugh got the nomination because he passed this litmus test, not because he’ll be an impartial judge on behalf of all Americans. If he were to be confirmed, women’s reproductive rights would be in the hands of five men on the Supreme Court.”

“Let’s be clear: a vote for Kavanaugh would be a vote to rip health care from American families and deny women their constitutional right to make their own health care decisions,” DNC Chair Tom Perez claimed.

53-year-old Kavanaugh is a currently a judge on the US Court of Appeals for the Washington DC circuit who has a background in politics. Prior to his nomination to the Washington DC circuit court back he was Bush’s White House staff secretary and worked for Bush during the 2000 Florida vote recount. He is a Yale Law School graduate.

Some have voiced objections to Kavanaugh as simply another Justice John Roberts. Others have complained he came straight out of the Ivy League and to Washington. He has never practiced law outside the beltway but took the direct route to the Bush White House. He served as staff secretary for former President George W. Bush, Jr. as well as working on the Florida recount during the contested Gore versus Bush election for the nation’s 43rd president.

In 1998, Kavanaugh co-wrote an impeachment report on Bill Clinton with special counsel Kenneth Starr. In the report, he argues for a broad definition of obstruction of justice – a crime for which special counsel Robert Mueller is reportedly investigating Trump.

Senator Richard Blumenthal (CT-D) is already demanding that Kavanaugh recuse himself on all matters regarding Mueller and the Russian collusion investigation. Sen. Justin Amash (MI-R) has also expressed his own reservations with Kavanaugh’s nomination citing considerable concern with regard to Kavanaugh’s previous ruling regarding the constitutionality of government surveillance of the American populace.

Image may contain: 1 person, smiling, text

Kavanaugh also played a role in the highly visible and contentious Elian Gonzales and Terri Schiavo cases. Last year, Kavanaugh ruled to prevent a teenager in immigrant detention from getting an abortion in Garza v. Hargan. When the ruling was later overturned by the full court, he claimed the decision would give immigrant minors a right to “immediate abortion on demand”. The judge has also frequently ruled against Obama-era environmental regulations and said he would like to strike down Washington DC’s ban on certain semi-automatic long guns.

Kavanaugh’s critics believe his actions in the teen-immigrant abortion case demonstrate an overt tendency to compromise that could signal an unwillingness to make waves on the Supreme Court. In a 2011 opinion, he wrote that the Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate could be made a “tax, not a fine,”  therefore providing a vehicle to allow a 2012 Supreme Court ruling that many Republicans believe saved the wildly unpopular 2010 healthcare law.

Kennedy was known as the swing vote on key issues, including abortion, same-sex marriage, and affirmative action. Leftists believe Kavanaugh could potentially signal the end of Roe v. Wade and their ability to escape consequences by murdering their offspring in the womb.

As pro-abortion folks flip their collective lids over the possibility of the overturn of Roe v. Wade with the replacement of Justice Kennedy and his swing vote….a couple of important factors to keep in mind —

  1. Roe v. Wade has a companion decision known as Doe v. Bolton. Both decided on the same day with Roe in Texas & Doe in Georgia. The decisions are always read together. Overturning Roe still leaves Doe intact.
  2. An overturning of Roe v. Wade does not outlaw abortion. It merely takes the federal government out of the equation allowing each state to decide whether they will allow abortion in their collective states or not.
  3. While I am vehemently & unapologetically pro-life & under NO circumstances do I find abortion an acceptable option, I also fully comprehend, & you should as well, that you cannot legislate morality.

This is an issue of the heart and mind. Abortions of various forms have been happening for centuries. While I very much want to see the overturn of this disgusting legal precedent brought forth by feminist attorneys that took advantage of a desperate woman, I also grasp that unless hearts and minds are changed and life is again viewed as the precious gift that it is – not much is going to change, at least with regards to the Roe v. Wade issue.

Join the conversation

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.


Dem Candidate Pushing ‘Irresponsible Breeder’ Tax On Certain Parents Because Of ‘Privilege’



Scott Wallace is a multimillionaire running in Pennsylvania’s 1st Congressional District against current incumbent Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (PA-R). Considered an elite, even amongst the wealthy, he boasts a net worth of between $127 million and $309 million, according to his financial disclosure statement. This would make him the third-richest member of Congress if he were elected to the House today.

From a hardline leftist pedigree, his grandfather was Henry Wallace, the “New Deal visionary” and one-time vice president under former President Franklin D. Roosevelt. His wealth is inherited, stemming from a seed company his grandfather founded that was purchased by DuPont for $10 billion in the 1990s, along with a large number of stocks with the largest being DowDuPont.

His campaign is largely self funded with Wallace claiming he is “putting a significant amount of my own assets into this because this is the most important thing I can imagine doing for America at this point in my life — this is a very expensive district to run in, but it is crucial in the Democrats’ efforts to retake the House.”

But just why this is so incredibly important to Wallace goes beyond the typical party lines of Republican and Democrat. Receiving endorsements from both Planned Parenthood and the National Organization for Women (NOW), Wallace is a population control zealot who believes families who choose to have more than two children are “irresponsible breeders” and should be taxed. Wallace has donated nearly $7 million dollars to various population control groups over the past 20 years, with the majority going through his own Wallace Global Fund.  In addition to its efforts towards population control, the foundation has also reportedly donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to anti-Israel groups that support a boycott of the Jewish State.

Fox News reports:

“Zero Population Growth (ZPG) was among the organizations that received the money from the fund. According to public records, it received $420,000 between 1997 and 2003.

The group, shortly after being founded in 1968, released a brochure advocating abortion to stabilize population growth and claimed that “no responsible family should have more than two children.” To deal with larger families, it also called for families to be “taxed to the hilt” for “irresponsible breeding.”

It also blamed the overpopulation on the ‘white middle-class’ that ‘use up more than their share of resources and do more than their share of polluting‘ and urged them to ‘voluntarily limit their families to two children.’

Paul Ehrlich, who co-founded the ZPG, once called abortion “a highly effective weapon in the armory of population control.” The goal of the organization, which changed its name to Population Connection in 2002, has remained the same since its inception, arguing that the world needs to contain population growth with particular emphasis on American families.

The organization’s political arm, Population Connection Action Fund, publicly endorsed Wallace for Congress, saying his support for their cause is “exactly the kind of dedication we need in Congress.”

Wallace’s fund also gave $20,000 in 2010 to the Center for the Advancement of the Steady State Economy (CASSE), a group that sees the economic growth as undesirable and instead supports an economy with ‘stable or mildly fluctuating levels’ and a society where birth rates equal death rates.

The organization openly supports zero population growth and its executive board member, Herman Daly, advocated issuing reproduction licenses, allowing women to have only two children unless they buy the license for more children from other women. Daly called it the ‘best plan yet offered’ to limit population growth.”

The group advocates strongly for abortion and along with taxing families “to the hilt” for having more than two children, as noted in a Yale Law School publication about the “voices that shaped the abortion debate before the Roe v. Wade Supreme Court’s ruling.”

The group advocates that –

  1. That no responsible family should have more than two children. Any family wanting to care for more than two children should adopt further children. Adopting children does not increase the population.
  2. All methods of birth control, including legalized abortion, should be freely available—and at no cost in poverty cases.
  3. Irresponsible people who have more than two children should be taxed to the hilt for the privilege of irresponsible breeding.

Fox News continued:

Zoe Wilson-Meyer, communications director for Wallace’s campaign, didn’t answer Fox News’ questions on whether Wallace still supports the ideas expressed by the groups.

“The Wallace Global Fund has for decades been a leader in helping women gain access to family planning. Former Co-Chair Scott Wallace is proud of the work of grantees like Planned Parenthood in empowering women and protecting reproductive rights and will stand up for Pennsylvania women,” she said in an email.

“In Washington, Brian Fitzpatrick voted to defund Planned Parenthood and supports Donald Trump’s effort to take away a woman’s right to choose,” she added.

Largely reminiscent of Nazi Germany who exercised eugenics to its full and most horrific potential, this policy of so-called “irresponsible breeders” also resembles the one-child policy from China that saw forced abortions or other forced invasive birth control procedures. Yet eugenics practices had their roots in America as well. American newspapers frequently offered praise for eugenics just prior to WWII and The Holocaust …. that is until Adolf Hitler revealed the true horrors of what eugenics really looked like. They avoided the subject for decades thereafter.

Nine out of ten eugenicists in the 20th Century were also Progressives or Socialists, and the most central component to the eugenic creed is the desire to engineer and centrally plan human reproduction, weeding out the unwanted or undesirable, according to a report on eugenics by PBS.

Yet where does that end? Who determines who is undesirable? Is it the unborn child conceived at an inconvenient time? The elderly mother? The child with cerebral palsy? Those with PTSD? Autism? Blue eyes? White skin? You cannot get to genocide without first visiting identity politics and they say the propagandist’s job is to effectively make the people forget his “enemy” is, in fact, a human being just as he is. It seems we never really do learn from history, do we?

Continue Reading


Trump Issued Major Warning: ‘We Will Look Into Discriminatory and Illegal Practice’ – It’s On!

Huge problems and everyone needs to know!



President Donald Trump voiced his concerns over “discriminatory and illegal practice” when he posted about the alleged controversy going on with Republicans being censored on Twitter. The tactic is sometimes referred to as “shadow banning” and it seems to be a strategy that social media platforms use to limit the visibility of some people. For example, ever wonder why someone who is genuinely popular might have tons of followers but their posts don’t seem to get many responses? It could be one of several reasons. Either they have fake followers, the post is no good, or they are being censored. In many cases, it’s a form of censorship that’s the obvious result. When a social media user goes from getting a lot of replies and views on their posts, then all of a sudden there’s very little replies and it seems like no one has seen the post – then they were hit with that form of censorship or suppression.

Social media platforms such as Twitter and Facebook have been called out for suppressing the content of certain Republican voices or those who support President Donald Trump. Well-known stars like Diamond and Silk have made it very public that they feel targeted for the views and opinions on their pages. That’s just the tip of the iceberg because the problem spans from targeting well-known mainstream people all the way down to the independent publishers. Censorship like this is affecting people’s careers and causing an unbalanced platform in which people with certain views are being limited. It might not be listed as a “ban” but it’s certainly limiting the viewership of certain people. The content that would once appear in people’s feed or timeline now requires a fine-tooth comb to find and it seems like people are realizing this more often and being upset with it.

Trump spoke about it on Twitter and Vice News completed a report on it.

Vice News reported: “Twitter is limiting the visibility of prominent Republicans in search results — a technique known as “shadow banning” — in what it says is a side effect of its attempts to improve the quality of discourse on the platform.

The Republican Party chair Ronna McDaniel, several conservative Republican congressmen, and Donald Trump Jr.’s spokesman no longer appear in the auto-populated drop-down search box on Twitter, VICE News has learned. It’s a shift that diminishes their reach on the platform — and it’s the same one being deployed against prominent racists to limit their visibility. The profiles continue to appear when conducting a full search, but not in the more convenient and visible drop-down bar. (The accounts appear to also populate if you already follow the person.)

Democrats are not being “shadow banned” in the same way, according to a VICE News review. McDaniel’s counterpart, Democratic Party chair Tom Perez, and liberal members of Congress — including Reps. Maxine Waters, Joe Kennedy III, Keith Ellison, and Mark Pocan — all continue to appear in drop-down search results. Not a single member of the 78-person Progressive Caucus faces the same situation in Twitter’s search.

“The notion that social media companies would suppress certain political points of view should concern every American,” McDaniel told VICE News in a statement. “Twitter owes the public answers to what’s really going on.”

Presented with screenshots of the searches, a Twitter spokesperson told VICE News: “We are aware that some accounts are not automatically populating in our search box and shipping a change to address this.” Asked why only conservative Republicans appear to be affected and not liberal Democrats, the spokesperson wrote: “I’d emphasize that our technology is based on account *behavior* not the content of Tweets.”

Twitter directed VICE News to a May 15 blog post that explained the company’s new approach to combating “troll-like behaviors.” After making changes to its platform, the company said that “[t]he result is that people contributing to the healthy conversation will be more visible in conversations and search.”

Twitter did not respond to a follow-up question.

Twitter’s troll hunt, however, has ensnared some of the most prominent Republicans in the country. Type in the names of McDaniel, conservative members of Congress like Reps. Mark Meadows, Jim Jordan, and Matt Gaetz, and Trump Jr.’s spokesman Andrew Surabian, for example, and Twitter’s drop-down search bar does not show their profiles. The search menu also does not display the verified profile of Rep. Devin Nunes of California, only his unverified one that he seldom uses to post.

That limits their visibility and the ease of finding their profiles compared to their liberal counterparts.

UPDATE: July 26, 10:00 AM: Twitter appears to have adjusted its platform overnight to no longer limit the visibility of some prominent Republicans in its search results.”

At what point do social media platforms give the control back to the people? Users should not have to worry about their views being censored by the machine.

Censoring any content that is not illegal should not be tolerated by the users.

Continue Reading

Like Us on Facebook



No trending posts found at this time.