Connect with us


Comey Just Broke His Silence And Drops Crushing Anvil On Hillary In Shocking Turn Of Events

That’s gonna leave a mark!



Disgraced former FBI Director James Comey with his sanctimonious smirk and carefully worded answers has no apparent plans to apologize to the twice-failed presidential candidate and perpetual sore loser Hillary Clinton for his famous public scolding in 2016 for her “grossly negligent” “extremely careless” handling of classified information via an unapproved, unsecured private email server.

In the recently released report from Inspector General Michael Horowitz, Comey was busted in an astounding display of abject hypocrisy for using a personal email account for conducting sensitive government business which was “inconsistent with the DOJ Policy Statement.”

What was Hillary being investigated for? Oh yes, using a personal email to conduct business. Well, gee whiz, because according to the report, the IG identified numerous instances in which Comey himself used a personal email account (a Gmail account) to conduct FBI business. Almost as if he found nothing wrong in what Hillary was doing because he was doing it all, himself, along with the current President and it seems everyone else in Washington. National security? We don’t need no national security!

Trending: Elected Democrat Official Who Viciously Attacked Veteran Just Learned Her Fate

Meanwhile, Hillary in an epic example of her lack of self-awareness and utter narcissism took to social media to gloat.

Except Rep. Ron DeSantis (FL-R)  was not having it! In a smackdown of epic proportion, DeSantis tweeted – “But BleachBit.” A reminder to all of the extent of Hillary’s duplicity.

Yet Comey will not own up to his own part in this entire debacle, still making excuses.

According to the Daily Wire

“During an interview Tuesday at an event in Berlin, Germany promoting his memoir A Higher Loyalty: Truth, Lies and Leadership, Comey was pressed by moderator Holger Stark on the “irritating” detail about his emails from the IG report and Clinton’s indignant response. Was it time to “apologize” to Clinton, asked the moderator.

“No, and here’s why,” Comey replied sharply. “Again I don’t want to criticize her, but it shows me that even at this late date she doesn’t understand what the investigation in her case was about. It was not about her use of personal email system, and she didn’t get that during the investigation.”

He continued: “She used to say, ‘Well, Colin Powell when he was Secretary used AOL.’ That was not what it was about. It was about communicating about classified topics on that system, when those topics have to be done on a classified email.”

Comey then explained how he used his personal email differently and concluded by saying he gets why people have tried to connect the two, but underscored that they are totally different things.”


But THAT’S DIFFERENT?? That’s literally the story Comey is going with in his effort to minimize his own part in this giant coup attempt against the American people.

Coup you say? Isn’t that a little strong? Well, look at this little timeline that might connect the dots on this hot mess and tell me what YOU would call it  –

U.S. Attorney Generals

• Jeff Sessions – 2/9/2017 – to present
• Sally Yates (acting) – 1/20/2017 – 1/30/2017
• Loretta Lynch – April 2015 – Jan. 2017
• Eric Holder – Feb. 2009 – April 2015

U.S. Deputy Attorney Generals –

• Rod Rosenstein – 4/26/2017 – to present
• Sally Yates – 1/10/2015 – 1/30/2017
• James Comey – Dec. 2003 – August 2005 & again August 2003 to roughly December 2003
• Larry Thompson – May 2001 – August 2003
• Robert Mueller – Jan. 2001 – May 2001
• Eric Holder – June 1997 – Jan. 2001

Director of FBI –
• James Comey – Sept. 2013 – May 2017
• Robert Mueller – Sept 2001 – Sept. 2013

Robert Mueller – Special Counsel For Russia Investigation: May 2017 – to present

Note the continued recurrence of the same folks, almost like it is some sort of big club and you are not in it!

Now from 2001 to 2005, there was an ongoing investigation into the Clinton Foundation. A Grand Jury had been empaneled. Foreign governments from around the world had donated to the so-called “Charity” except from 2001 to 2003 none of those “Donations” to the Clinton Foundation were declared.

None other than Comey himself took over the investigation in 2002. What a truly astounding coincidence! Lois Lerner, the same Lois Lerner that painted targets on the backs of every Conservative, right-wing, Tea Party group seeking tax exemption, was transferred to the Internal Revenue Service to run the Tax Exemption Branch of the IRS.

Then in an utterly starting twist of convenient coincidence,  none other than the Assistant Attorney General of the United States, Rod Rosenstein was running the Tax Division inside the Department of JUST-US from 2001 to 2005. Current Special Counsel Robert Mueller was Director of the FBI during this timeframe as well.

What do these four people have in common? Each and every one was briefed and/or investigators on the frontlines in the investigation into the Clinton Foundation…still just coincidence? Not convinced?

Fast forward to 2009. Comey leaves the Justice Department to go and cash-in at Lockheed Martin. Hillary Clinton is now running the State Department under the Obama Administration, on her own personal email server by the way. The Uranium One “issue” comes to the attention of Hillary and like all good public servants do, you know looking out for America’s best interest and all (cough…cough) she decides to support the decision and approve the sale of 20% of US Uranium to none other than…DUN DUN DA…THE RUSSIANS!

Naturally, the American people lost. It seems to be par for the course, but just a business deal, right? Nothing to see here…or was there?

Just prior to the sale being approved, Bill Clinton makes a little jaunt to Moscow and returns $500,000 richer all for the bargain of giving a 1-hour speech and blessing Vladimir Putin with his presence for a few hours. The FBI then placed an internal mole what in the midst of the money laundering and bribery festivities. Mueller is still the head of the FBI and was apparently so very dedicated to selling out his own country, he even personally delivered a Uranium sample to Moscow in 2009.

And guess who handled this case within the Justice Department out of the US Attorney’s Office in Maryland? Why it’s Rod Rosenstein yet again! It’s like Deja Vu!!

And I bet you will never guess just what happened to that FBI mole? Well in an effort to thank him for his service the DOJ placed a gag order on him, threatening to lock him up if he ever decided to have an attack of conscience and speak out about it.

It’s an interesting turn of events, an utter anomaly of statistics and probability right? I mean just how does 20% of the most strategic of US assets end up in Russian hands when the FBI has an informant tapped and ready to testify regarding insider information on the entire criminal enterprise?

Well, in yet another staggering twist of mere “coincidence” a mysterious $145 million donation was made to the Clinton Foundation from entities directly connected to the Uranium One deal….just out of the goodness of their hearts, I’m sure! Lois Lerner is still at the IRS heading up the Charitable Division.

Then in 2013, Comey becomes FBI Director, magically securing 17 separate no-bid contracts for his employer (Lockheed Martin) with the State Department. Comey was rewarded with a $6 million thank you present when he left. Incredible “negotiation” on those no-bid contacts huh? *wink, wink*

Now Comey is the FBI Director “in charge” of the “Clinton Email Investigation” though naturally, he gets his good buddy Lois Learner off after the FBI “investigates” that little IRS matter. Nope…no crimes here…nothing to see…move along…

Now fast forward to 2015…Due to a series of “unfortunate” events in Benghazi and after the 9 different separate and distinct “investigations” conducted by the House, the Senate, and the State Department, Trey Gowdy ran a 10th investigation after being named as Chairman of the Select Committee on Benghazi.

Gowdy discovers Hilary ran the entire State Department on an unclassified, unauthorized, unsecured, personal email server. He also discovered through the course of his investigation (the 10th one mind you) that none, zero, zippo, nada, zilch was turned over of those emails when she departed from her “Public Service” as Secretary of State which was required by law. Additionally, Gowdy also discovered Top Secret information contained within her personally archived email.

Then there was the cover-up from the John Kerry led State Department….delay, delay, lie, lie, lie, delay some more…and everything humanly possible was done to cover-up for Hillary and her criminal endeavors, likely because as the IG Report recently revealed Comey was an active participant himself, as was former President Obama.

In April 2016 Comey drafts an exoneration letter of Hillary Rodham Clinton, all while the DOJ hands out immunity deals like candy. No convening if a Grand Jury…nothing. Hillary exonerated on 7/8/2016 by Coney himself with a little help from his “friends” in a move the IG referred to as “insubordinate” and in “defiance of authority.”

Rosenstein then becomes the Assistant Attorney General, and Comey gets fired based upon a letter by Rosenstein. Comey then leaks government information to the press and their good buddy Mueller is assigned to the investigation into the whole Russia debacle.

But Comey did not do a blessed thing wrong! His situation was DIFFERENT! And the malfeasance in Washington continues! Pick a crime, any crime! FISA abuse, political espionage….you name it! All the same players, same bat time, same bat channel, same corruption, hopelessly compromised, conflicted without a shred of integrity in sight!

And you know magically not once in its 20 + years of operation has the Clinton Foundation ever been audited by the IRS? Zero, none, nada, zilch!

However, the tables have turned. Comey himself is now under investigation by the IG’s office and it seems he wants to talk. One only wonders how much more will be revealed about the ongoing crime spree in Washington.

Join the conversation

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.


Dem Candidate Pushing ‘Irresponsible Breeder’ Tax On Certain Parents Because Of ‘Privilege’



Scott Wallace is a multimillionaire running in Pennsylvania’s 1st Congressional District against current incumbent Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (PA-R). Considered an elite, even amongst the wealthy, he boasts a net worth of between $127 million and $309 million, according to his financial disclosure statement. This would make him the third-richest member of Congress if he were elected to the House today.

From a hardline leftist pedigree, his grandfather was Henry Wallace, the “New Deal visionary” and one-time vice president under former President Franklin D. Roosevelt. His wealth is inherited, stemming from a seed company his grandfather founded that was purchased by DuPont for $10 billion in the 1990s, along with a large number of stocks with the largest being DowDuPont.

His campaign is largely self funded with Wallace claiming he is “putting a significant amount of my own assets into this because this is the most important thing I can imagine doing for America at this point in my life — this is a very expensive district to run in, but it is crucial in the Democrats’ efforts to retake the House.”

But just why this is so incredibly important to Wallace goes beyond the typical party lines of Republican and Democrat. Receiving endorsements from both Planned Parenthood and the National Organization for Women (NOW), Wallace is a population control zealot who believes families who choose to have more than two children are “irresponsible breeders” and should be taxed. Wallace has donated nearly $7 million dollars to various population control groups over the past 20 years, with the majority going through his own Wallace Global Fund.  In addition to its efforts towards population control, the foundation has also reportedly donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to anti-Israel groups that support a boycott of the Jewish State.

Fox News reports:

“Zero Population Growth (ZPG) was among the organizations that received the money from the fund. According to public records, it received $420,000 between 1997 and 2003.

The group, shortly after being founded in 1968, released a brochure advocating abortion to stabilize population growth and claimed that “no responsible family should have more than two children.” To deal with larger families, it also called for families to be “taxed to the hilt” for “irresponsible breeding.”

It also blamed the overpopulation on the ‘white middle-class’ that ‘use up more than their share of resources and do more than their share of polluting‘ and urged them to ‘voluntarily limit their families to two children.’

Paul Ehrlich, who co-founded the ZPG, once called abortion “a highly effective weapon in the armory of population control.” The goal of the organization, which changed its name to Population Connection in 2002, has remained the same since its inception, arguing that the world needs to contain population growth with particular emphasis on American families.

The organization’s political arm, Population Connection Action Fund, publicly endorsed Wallace for Congress, saying his support for their cause is “exactly the kind of dedication we need in Congress.”

Wallace’s fund also gave $20,000 in 2010 to the Center for the Advancement of the Steady State Economy (CASSE), a group that sees the economic growth as undesirable and instead supports an economy with ‘stable or mildly fluctuating levels’ and a society where birth rates equal death rates.

The organization openly supports zero population growth and its executive board member, Herman Daly, advocated issuing reproduction licenses, allowing women to have only two children unless they buy the license for more children from other women. Daly called it the ‘best plan yet offered’ to limit population growth.”

The group advocates strongly for abortion and along with taxing families “to the hilt” for having more than two children, as noted in a Yale Law School publication about the “voices that shaped the abortion debate before the Roe v. Wade Supreme Court’s ruling.”

The group advocates that –

  1. That no responsible family should have more than two children. Any family wanting to care for more than two children should adopt further children. Adopting children does not increase the population.
  2. All methods of birth control, including legalized abortion, should be freely available—and at no cost in poverty cases.
  3. Irresponsible people who have more than two children should be taxed to the hilt for the privilege of irresponsible breeding.

Fox News continued:

Zoe Wilson-Meyer, communications director for Wallace’s campaign, didn’t answer Fox News’ questions on whether Wallace still supports the ideas expressed by the groups.

“The Wallace Global Fund has for decades been a leader in helping women gain access to family planning. Former Co-Chair Scott Wallace is proud of the work of grantees like Planned Parenthood in empowering women and protecting reproductive rights and will stand up for Pennsylvania women,” she said in an email.

“In Washington, Brian Fitzpatrick voted to defund Planned Parenthood and supports Donald Trump’s effort to take away a woman’s right to choose,” she added.

Largely reminiscent of Nazi Germany who exercised eugenics to its full and most horrific potential, this policy of so-called “irresponsible breeders” also resembles the one-child policy from China that saw forced abortions or other forced invasive birth control procedures. Yet eugenics practices had their roots in America as well. American newspapers frequently offered praise for eugenics just prior to WWII and The Holocaust …. that is until Adolf Hitler revealed the true horrors of what eugenics really looked like. They avoided the subject for decades thereafter.

Nine out of ten eugenicists in the 20th Century were also Progressives or Socialists, and the most central component to the eugenic creed is the desire to engineer and centrally plan human reproduction, weeding out the unwanted or undesirable, according to a report on eugenics by PBS.

Yet where does that end? Who determines who is undesirable? Is it the unborn child conceived at an inconvenient time? The elderly mother? The child with cerebral palsy? Those with PTSD? Autism? Blue eyes? White skin? You cannot get to genocide without first visiting identity politics and they say the propagandist’s job is to effectively make the people forget his “enemy” is, in fact, a human being just as he is. It seems we never really do learn from history, do we?

Continue Reading


Trump Issued Major Warning: ‘We Will Look Into Discriminatory and Illegal Practice’ – It’s On!

Huge problems and everyone needs to know!



President Donald Trump voiced his concerns over “discriminatory and illegal practice” when he posted about the alleged controversy going on with Republicans being censored on Twitter. The tactic is sometimes referred to as “shadow banning” and it seems to be a strategy that social media platforms use to limit the visibility of some people. For example, ever wonder why someone who is genuinely popular might have tons of followers but their posts don’t seem to get many responses? It could be one of several reasons. Either they have fake followers, the post is no good, or they are being censored. In many cases, it’s a form of censorship that’s the obvious result. When a social media user goes from getting a lot of replies and views on their posts, then all of a sudden there’s very little replies and it seems like no one has seen the post – then they were hit with that form of censorship or suppression.

Social media platforms such as Twitter and Facebook have been called out for suppressing the content of certain Republican voices or those who support President Donald Trump. Well-known stars like Diamond and Silk have made it very public that they feel targeted for the views and opinions on their pages. That’s just the tip of the iceberg because the problem spans from targeting well-known mainstream people all the way down to the independent publishers. Censorship like this is affecting people’s careers and causing an unbalanced platform in which people with certain views are being limited. It might not be listed as a “ban” but it’s certainly limiting the viewership of certain people. The content that would once appear in people’s feed or timeline now requires a fine-tooth comb to find and it seems like people are realizing this more often and being upset with it.

Trump spoke about it on Twitter and Vice News completed a report on it.

Vice News reported: “Twitter is limiting the visibility of prominent Republicans in search results — a technique known as “shadow banning” — in what it says is a side effect of its attempts to improve the quality of discourse on the platform.

The Republican Party chair Ronna McDaniel, several conservative Republican congressmen, and Donald Trump Jr.’s spokesman no longer appear in the auto-populated drop-down search box on Twitter, VICE News has learned. It’s a shift that diminishes their reach on the platform — and it’s the same one being deployed against prominent racists to limit their visibility. The profiles continue to appear when conducting a full search, but not in the more convenient and visible drop-down bar. (The accounts appear to also populate if you already follow the person.)

Democrats are not being “shadow banned” in the same way, according to a VICE News review. McDaniel’s counterpart, Democratic Party chair Tom Perez, and liberal members of Congress — including Reps. Maxine Waters, Joe Kennedy III, Keith Ellison, and Mark Pocan — all continue to appear in drop-down search results. Not a single member of the 78-person Progressive Caucus faces the same situation in Twitter’s search.

“The notion that social media companies would suppress certain political points of view should concern every American,” McDaniel told VICE News in a statement. “Twitter owes the public answers to what’s really going on.”

Presented with screenshots of the searches, a Twitter spokesperson told VICE News: “We are aware that some accounts are not automatically populating in our search box and shipping a change to address this.” Asked why only conservative Republicans appear to be affected and not liberal Democrats, the spokesperson wrote: “I’d emphasize that our technology is based on account *behavior* not the content of Tweets.”

Twitter directed VICE News to a May 15 blog post that explained the company’s new approach to combating “troll-like behaviors.” After making changes to its platform, the company said that “[t]he result is that people contributing to the healthy conversation will be more visible in conversations and search.”

Twitter did not respond to a follow-up question.

Twitter’s troll hunt, however, has ensnared some of the most prominent Republicans in the country. Type in the names of McDaniel, conservative members of Congress like Reps. Mark Meadows, Jim Jordan, and Matt Gaetz, and Trump Jr.’s spokesman Andrew Surabian, for example, and Twitter’s drop-down search bar does not show their profiles. The search menu also does not display the verified profile of Rep. Devin Nunes of California, only his unverified one that he seldom uses to post.

That limits their visibility and the ease of finding their profiles compared to their liberal counterparts.

UPDATE: July 26, 10:00 AM: Twitter appears to have adjusted its platform overnight to no longer limit the visibility of some prominent Republicans in its search results.”

At what point do social media platforms give the control back to the people? Users should not have to worry about their views being censored by the machine.

Censoring any content that is not illegal should not be tolerated by the users.

Continue Reading

Like Us on Facebook



No trending posts found at this time.