Connect with us

Politics

BREAKING: These 4 Women Just Made New Accusations Against Bill Clinton, And Told His Dirty Secret About What He Did On AF1  

Published

on

Bill Maher made a statement on his HBO show last week about the recent explosion in sexual assault allegations that couldn’t have been any more ironic. While most of the accusations have been against those in the entertainment industry, a number of politicians have had alleged misconduct int he past come to haunt them, such as Alabama Senate hopeful Roy Moore.

Maher acknowledged that Al Franken, who has been accused by anchorwoman Leeann Tweeden of groping and kissing her without consent during a USO tour in 2006, had done “a bad thing” and deserved the universal condemnation he’s received. Maher did have a caveat, however, saying that Franken “didn’t deserve to be lumped in” with other prominent figures facing sexual misconduct allegations, such as the aforementioned Moore, Hollywood actor Kevin Spacey, movie mogul Harvey Weinstein, and even President Donald Trump.

Now what the heck was his “logic” behind the statement? That “Trump called his accusers liars, threatened to sue them, did long riffs at his rallies where he’d say they were too ugly for him to assault,” said Maher. “Plus, with Al Franken we’re talking about one incident. Trump has 16 accusers. Roy Moore has nine.”

Obviously, Trump is a much larger figure, and thus a more likely target for false allegations, but another obvious difference is that Trump has denied all such accusations he’s faced in the past, while Franken admitted wrongdoing. It’s a crime vs. a situation that maybe could’ve happened.

Still, Bill concluded that Democrats lampoon their sexual predators, while Republicans elect theirs to the Presidency – which is an insanely ironic comment for anyone with a political attention span that dates back more than a few decades.

As the Daily Mail reminds us, (or maybe just Maher, for that matter), former President Bill Clinton has raced accusations since long before he was ever President until today. And the response from Democrats? Complete silence. Democrats didn’t even bother to address the allegations made against Bill when Donald Trump mentioned them during his second debate with Hillary Clinton in front of tens of millions of viewers. I assume that’s because they had no rebuttal.

Bill Clinton is facing explosive new charges of sexual assault from four women, according to highly placed Democratic Party sources and an official who served in both the Clinton and Obama administrations.

The current accusations against the 71-year-old former president — whose past is littered with charges of sexual misconduct — stem from the period after he left the White House in 2001, say the sources.

Attorneys representing the women, who are coordinating their efforts, have notified Clinton they are preparing to file four separate lawsuits against him.

It wouldn’t be the first time either. Back in 1990, Bill paid $850,000 to settle a sexual harassment lawsuit by Paula Jones, a former Arkansas state employee whose case led to Clinton’s impeachment by the House of Representatives. Jones was among Bill’s sexual accusers that Donald Trump invited to his second debate with Hillary.

The four women, who have not yet revealed their identities, were employed in low-level positions at the Burkle organization when they were in their late teens and claim they were sexually assaulted by the former president.

The new charges are likely to revive the debate over why Democrats defended Clinton during the Monica Lewinsky scandal and why liberals and feminists ignored credible charges of sexual assault against the 42nd president, not only from Paula Jones, but also from Juanita Broaddrick, Kathleen Willey, and others.

‘Bill is distraught at the thought of having to testify and defend himself against sex charges again,’ said a Democratic Party official who is familiar with the case.
‘He hopes his legal team can somehow stop the women from filing charges and drag him through the mud.’

Some Democrats are finally siding against Bill, including the far-left Vox.

How convenient that the Left is willing to admit as much nearly two decades after Bill’s presidential term ended.

Join the conversation

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.

Frank Lea

BREAKING!! TRUMP Is ARRESTING BOTH!! FINALLY!!!

THAT TOOK BALLS!!

Published

on

President Trump dropped a major bomb on the heads of two people significant to the Democrat party. He blasted them on Twitter with an explosive Tweet that called for the shocking arrest of the top democratic nominee for President and her number one sidekick. Trump lambasted them with a barrage of words in the 280 Twitter limit and in that very brief message he called for Hillary Clinton and Huma Abedin to be jailed.

Among scandals, investigations, and outlets like Wikileaks releasing information not previously seen by the public, it’s no wonder the pair has found them in the spotlight of Trump’s vicious Twitter account. When Trump isn’t reminding Kim Jong-un that America will nuke the daylights out of them if they ever attack the United States, then Trump is calling out his foes left and right. He’s delivering knockout blows to everyone like he’s an undefeated Glass Joe in Mike Tyson’s punch out. Or better yet, Trump is to Twitter, what Mike Tyson was to boxing when he decimated opponents in very short boxing matches. They weren’t matches, they were a massacre, and that’s what Trump does to people.

Now we hear about Hillary Clinton making various headlines. We read about boxes of “Muslim files” being removed from the White House. We witness a house fire at Clinton’s house, and immediately people say things like “what files did she accidentally leave in the room that caught fire,” and there’s just so much information swirling together about Clinton. People wonder if Trump will be the one who puts her behind bars. If he does, then what will the retaliation be?

Freedom Daily reported:
President Trump made a shocking post on social media, where he formally called for the immediate arrest of both Hillary Clinton and her Muslim Brotherhood sidekick, Huma Abedin. Over the past several weeks, both women’s scandalous antics have been making headlines, after news broke of how the pair removed 5 boxes of “Muslim files” from the White House to cover Obama’s dirty secrets, where the deed was accomplished after they falsely claimed that the box contained “unclassified personal materials.” Now just 24 hours after President Trump called for their arrest, Wikileaks has just dropped another bombshell, and now news of Guantanamo being prepared for “VIP American detainees” is making many speculate that Trump is about to make good on his campaign promise to “lock her up.”

It gets deeper. Wikileaks looks over the neighborly fence like Wilson from Home Improvement. They whispered over the fence about some more damning information that could put another dent in her career. The Gateway Pundit stopped by to expose the New York Times for collusion with Hillary Clinton in a scathing attempt to conceal scandals. This was done by allegedly notifying Clinton of the stories they would run in advance, that way Clinton could prepare her response if a “spin” was needed.

Gateway Pundit reported:
“Wikileaks revealed in a midnight tweet late Saturday into Sunday that a New York Times reporter used to email the State Department giving them updates on stories they would be running several days in advance.

Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State at the time. This would give her State Department enough to time to distract or put a spin on the new revelations.

“Email shows New York Times handed over Cablegate’s publication schedule to the US government (without telling @WikiLeaks) giving the State Department, then headed by Hillary Clinton, up to 9 days in advance to spin the revelations or create diversions,” Wikileaks tweeted.”

WikiLeaks is the one guy at school who just didn’t care. They called it as they saw it, unafraid of consequences, and brave enough to say it like it is.

Tom Fitton is also like that. He’s the President of Judicial Watch. He made a strong statement against Hillary and Huma Abedin.

“We already know the Obama State Department let Hillary Clinton steal and then delete her government emails, which included classified information. But these new records show that was only part of the scandal. These new documents show the Obama State Department had a deal with Hillary Clinton to hide her calls logs and schedules, which would be contrary to FOIA and other laws. When are the American people going to get an honest investigation of the Clinton crimes?”

He’s calling for a more honest investigation. Although, with that house fire that just happened in the Clinton Compound, then it’s easy to wonder if that fire was set on purpose and information destroyed. Then again, it doesn’t make sense to destroy information in their own home. They could have something destroyed without a trace if they wanted to do so. It’s Hillary, she can pull those things off and people know this. Maybe the fact that they see this is why so many investigators are hesitant to truly find anything.

Are investigators scared to crack open a hard shell full of evidence?

Is Trump the President who will hold Hillary and Huma’s hands as they’re walked into prison?

What happens next?

FOLLOW us on Facebook at mPolitical!

Continue Reading

Matt Palumbo

BREAKING NEWS…. TRUMP Just Declared A NATIONAL EMERGENCY!!!

THEY BETTER WATCH OUT!

Published

on

By

You probably didn’t see it in the mainstream media but among the executive orders signed by Donald Trump recently declared a national emergency. The executive order, addressed to Congress, states that pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, he’s declaring a national emergency with respect to “the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States posed by serious human rights abuse and corruption around the world.” In other words, the act is targeting international human rights abusers.

Given the timing of this order and the recent drama with the United Nations, which overwhelmingly passed a resolution dissenting from Trump’s declaration of Jerusalem of the capital of Israel, it’s apparently directed at many of those countries. It’s clear that they’ve gone unchecked thus far – and one should not look further than their treatment of Israel to prove as much. According to Unbiased America, in 2016, the U.N. general assembly passed five times more resolutions against Israel than against North Korea, Syria, Russia, Iran, and the rest of world combined.

The executive order reads:

TO THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES:

Pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, as amended (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (IEEPA), I hereby report that I have issued the enclosed Executive Order (the “order”) declaring a national emergency with respect to the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States posed by serious human rights abuse and corruption around the world. In addition to taking action under IEEPA, the order implements the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act (Public Law 114-328) (the “Act”) and delegates certain of its authorities.

The order blocks the property and interests in property of persons listed in the Annex to the order. It also blocks the property and interests in property of any foreign person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General:

(1) to be responsible for or complicit in, or to have directly or indirectly engaged in, serious human rights abuse;

(2) to be a current or former government official, or a person acting for or on behalf of such an official, who is responsible for or complicit in, or has directly or indirectly engaged in:

(a) corruption, including the misappropriation of state assets, the expropriation of private assets for personal gain, corruption related to government contracts or the extraction of natural resources, or bribery; or

(b) the transfer or the facilitation of the transfer of the proceeds of corruption;

(3) to be or have been a leader or official of:

(a) an entity, including any government entity, that has engaged in, or whose members have engaged in, any of the activities described in (1), (2)(a), or (2)(b) above relating to the leader’s or official’s tenure; or

(b) an entity whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to the order as a result of activities related to the leader’s or the official’s tenure; or

(4) to have attempted to engage in any of the activities described in (1), (2)(a), or (2)(b) above.

The order also blocks any person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General:

(5) to have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services to or in support of:

(a) any activity described in (1), (2)(a), or (2)(b) above that is conducted by a foreign person;

(b) any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to the order; or

(c) any entity described in (3)(a) above where the activity is conducted by a foreign person;

(6) to be owned or controlled by, or to have acted or purported to act for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to the order; or

(7) to have attempted to engage in any of the activities described in (5) or (6) above.

In addition, the order suspends entry into the United States of any alien listed in the Annex or determined to meet one or more of the criteria above.

I have delegated to the Secretary of the Treasury the authority, in consultation with the Secretary of State, to take such actions, including adopting rules and regulations, and to employ all powers granted to the President by IEEPA and the Act, as may be necessary to implement the order and relevant provisions of the Act. I have delegated to the Secretary of State the authority to take such actions, including adopting rules and regulations, and to employ all powers granted to the President by IEEPA and the Act, as may be necessary to implement the provisions of the order and the Act suspending entry into the United States of certain aliens. All executive departments and agencies are directed to take all appropriate measures within their authority to implement the order.

DONALD J. TRUMP

THE WHITE HOUSE,
December 20, 2017.

According to Freedom Daily, the executive order is directed against some specific individuals. Among them include an Israeli billionaire, the head of Nicaragua’s electoral commission, and the former president of Gambia.They are:

1. Mukhtar Hamid Shah; Date of Birth (DOB) August 11, 1939; alt. DOB November 8, 1939; nationality, Pakistan

2. Angel Rondon Rijo; DOB July 16, 1950; nationality, Dominican Republic

3. Dan Gertler; DOB December 23, 1973; nationality, Israel; alt. nationality, Democratic Republic of the Congo

4. Maung Maung Soe; DOB March 1964; nationality, Burma

5. Yahya Jammeh; DOB May 25, 1965; nationality, The Gambia

6. Sergey Kusiuk; DOB December 1, 1966; nationality, Ukraine; alt. nationality, Russia

7. Benjamin Bol Mel; DOB January 3, 1978; alt. DOB December 24, 1978; nationality, South Sudan; alt. nationality, Sudan

8. Julio Antonio Juárez Ramírez; DOB December 1, 1980; nationality, Guatemala

9. Goulnora Islamovna Karimova; DOB July 8, 1972; nationality, Uzbekistan

10. Slobodan Tesic; DOB December 21, 1958; nationality, Serbia

11. Artem Yuryevich Chayka; DOB September 25, 1975; nationality, Russia

12. Gao Yan; DOB April 1963; nationality, China

13. Roberto Jose Rivas Reyes; DOB July 6, 1954; nationality, Nicaragua

How will the United Nations respond? Will they ignore real problems do things that matter?

FOLLOW us on Facebook at mPolitical!

Continue Reading

Frank Lea

BREAKING!! PELOSI IS DONE! MASSIVE Scandal EXPLODES!

HOPE YOU LIKE WEARING ORANGE JUMPSUITS!

Published

on

A sickly number of sexually related assault charges has struck California so hard that people are resigning like lemmings walking off a cliff. One by one their career ends, and they walk off the cliff of employment. There they go, down into the hole of obscurity. Or prison. Some of the recently resigned might find themselves in jail over what they did, and Nancy Pelosi is no different. She’s recently gone off the hinges as well, which is par the norm for her daily activity, but this could be the massive scandal that explodes and destroys much of the Democratic party from the inside out.

Democrats found themselves buried up to their necks in accusations and drowning in their misery. It’s bad. The levels of trust with the public have dwindled down to barely anything. It’s like when parents teach young kids about “stranger danger,” and the Democrats are big-time strangers as they’re being called out for their alleged involvement in some disturbing behaviors.

Daily Wire reported:
“This whole issue has hit a critical mass in a very short time. I’ve never seen anything like it before — and I don’t know where it ends.”

South and others claim that Democrats have suffered from a severe decline in public trust. The Hollywood leftists who have bankrolled Democratic candidates at both the state and federal level are now under scrutiny, as Harvey Weinstein, perhaps chief among the entertainment industry’s political powerhouses, is facing dozens of sexual harassment, sexual assault, and rape allegations — and, quite possibly, an indictment.

The major Democratic players who represent some of California’s biggest urban areas can’t escape the tarnish. Even Rep. Nancy Pelosi isn’t immune, the article claims, because she stalled Rep. John Conyers’s resignation, calling Conyers an “American icon” and pleading with him to remain in office, even as more women came forward to accuse Conyers of bizarre — and often sexual — behavior.

So many Hollywood leftists were accused of sexual assault, sexual harassment, and even rape. That doesn’t look good for the Democrat party that the celebrity elites often standby. All those words speaking out from the #MeToo has been more like one big finger pointing at Democrats as they continuously get tossed under the rolling wheels of sexually charged crime allegations.

People like Nancy Pelosi are no different. She stood up for John Conyers and stalled his resignation as he faced his accusations that could end his career. With Pelosi supporting him, does that mean she knew of his alleged behavior from the past, and she was OK with it because it wasn’t directed towards her? Did she know about any of this and keep it secret?

All that finger pointing by Hollywood elites telling people how to behave and they were the ones misbehaving. It’s funny that we witnessed so many of the Democrats tell people what to do, or not to do, and they were the people perpetrating crimes on innocent victims.

The California Assembly is itself embroiled in its own sex scandal. Dozens of women signed a petition to demand accountability from Democratic legislators they claim have sexually harassed aides and staff. They even have their own movement: #WeSaidEnough.

The Assembly plans to hold hours of hearings dedicated to sexual harassment within its ranks when it reconvenes in January, and the State Senate has hired two separate law firms, Politico reports, to handle what leadership believes will be a wave of claims. Nancy Pelosi’s daughter, Alexandra, is leading a group of progressive feminists attacking California state Democrats from the left, accusing them of covering up for abusers in their ranks while labeling themselves great protectors of women’s rights.

Democrats have yet to see electoral fallout from D.C. and Hollywood scandals, but Politico seems convinced that, at least in California, certain seats are likely to remain vacant or even flip to Republican if state-based scandals make national headlines. Californians prefer Democrats, that’s not in doubt, but they may want a change of pace from their regular representation.

What’s next for Nancy Pelosi and the big wigs of the Democrat party? The Hollywood scandal is massive and there are so many accusations that it would take a room full of people to compile a complete list. There are so many Democrats wrapped up in criminal activity who are being supported by people like Nancy Pelosi, and people have to wonder how far down the hole she’s going with them.

Is Nancy Pelosi, and her support for the accused people like John Conyers, the next to fall?

FOLLOW us on Facebook at mPolitical!

Continue Reading

Like Us on Facebook

Recent

Trending

No trending posts found at this time.

Trending Now