Connect with us


Big Just Called On Military Overnight To Overthrow Trump After Declaring It’s Time

It’s getting serious…



Cue outrage as the media, political pundits, and talking heads are all aflutter this morning with claims that President Donald Trump’s language and demeanor on Monday’s summit in Helsinki with Russian President Vladimir Putin was somehow treasonous. The summit is being billed as the #TreasonSummit on Twitter came just a scant 72 hours after the Department of Justice issued its unsourced and suspiciously timed indictment of 12 Russian officials for hacking the DNC despite having never even laid eyes on the DNC server.

The DOJ “indicts” 12 Russians that will never stand trial just one business day prior to President Trump meeting with Putin. The mainstream media goes into overdrive cranking out propaganda hit pieces like New York Times veteran employee Charles Blow’s Sunday op-ed “Trump, Treasonous Traitor” hours before the event even took place.

President Trump and Putin held a joint press conference and pointed out that both sides are to blame for the poor relationship the countries have. Then he declined the opportunity to slam Putin for buying some Facebook ads in the 2016 election.

President Trump’s position has more or less been that peace with Russia is more important than election meddling, which did not influence the election. America is far from innocent in this process as they have been meddling in the elections of foreign nations for a long time. Perhaps let us simply mend fences and call it a day. Move forward as two nuclear superpowers and work together. I believe we call that diplomacy?

Yet that clearly is not the goal here from Washington.

Hillary asks President Trump via Twitter – “Do you know what team you play for?” referring to the Trump/Putin Summit.

My question for Hillary – I dunno. Do you?

After all, Hillary sold Russia 20% of American uranium after a bunch of people connected to the transaction heavily contributed to her foundation which was approved by a rubber-stamp committee under the former Obama administration while Hillary “served” as Secretary of State. Then just four months later, former President Bill Clinton collected a cool $500k in speaking fees from a Russian investment bank during a trip after he and Putin hung out at Putin’s private home.

Then Putin himself dropped the bombshell at Monday’s Summit where he claims U.S. Intelligence agents funneled some $400 million in illegally earned profits into Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign by associates of American-born British financier Bill Browder – at one time the largest foreign portfolio investors in Russia. The scheme involved members of the U.S. intelligence community said Putin, who he said “accompanied and guided these transactions.”

Hillary sells 20% of our nuclear fuel supply to Russia – Eh…no biggy! It’s all good.

President Trump says nice things to Putin – OMG!! IT’S TREASON!!!

(((Cue incoherent screeching)))

Then former CIA Director John Brennan called President Trump’s performance at the Summit “nothing short of treasonous” yet he himself effectively called for a coup against the president should President Trump give the order to fire Special Counsel Robert Mueller.

Yet in July 2018 Brennan told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer at the Aspen Security Forum – “I think it’s the obligation of some executive branch officials to refuse to carry that out. I would just hope that this is not going to be a partisan issue. That Republicans, Democrats are going to see that the future of this government is at stake and something needs to be done for the good of the future.”

Brennan openly supported the USSR, voted Communist, and supported Communist rule over America while Putin was still working as an agent with the KGB. Yet now Brennan wants to tell the American people that President Trump having a 2-hour closed-door meeting with Putin consists of “treason.” How does that work exactly?

Senator Rand Paul (KY-R) took to social media to call Brennan out publically and remind Brennan of his own record, stating – “This is coming from the guy who voted for the Communist Party USA candidate in 1976. Give me a break.”

Then former FBI Director James Comey issued what many may be construed as a call to action against a sitting US President also known as a coup d’etat. Comey tweeted late Monday afternoon after the Summit had concluded – “This was the day an American president stood on foreign soil next to a murderous lying thug and refused to back his own country. Patriots need to stand up and reject the behavior of this president.”

Meanwhile, Rep. Steve Cohen (TN-D) who stated he would award the Purple Heart to anti-Trump FBI lovebird Peter Strzok during testimony in front of the House Oversight and Judiciary committees regarding Strzok’s bias against President Trump. Amid significant backlash for his grotesquely disrespectful comments, Cohen tried to walk it back shortly thereafter, stating in an interview with CNN’s Ana Cabrera – “I regret using the term ‘Purple Heart. I used it metaphorically, not literally. I never thought, literally, it should be given to Agent Strzok.”

To review for the ignorant – The Purple Heart is awarded to any member of the Armed Forces of the United States who, while serving in any capacity with one of the U.S. Armed Services after April 5, 1917, has been wounded or killed by an instrument of war in the hands of the enemy and posthumously to the next of kin in the name of those who are killed in action or die of wounds received in action. It is specifically a combat decoration. This is what this political despot want to award a lying disgrace of humanity subpoenaed before Congress to answer for his actions.

After the Summit, Cohen revealed he meant every word quite literally as he then took to Twitter to call for the military to rise up against a sitting President. Cohen tweeted – “Where are our military folks ? The Commander in Chief is in the hands of our enemy!”

Cohen meanwhile makes it a habit to disrespect the very same military that he is calling on to rise up against a sitting president from believe Purple Hearts should go to liars and traitors to sitting down at a Memphis Grizzlies playing with his cell phone during the National Anthem.

Congressman Steve Cohen (TN-D) represents the 9th District of Tennessee. Here he is at a Memphis Grizzlies game on…

Posted by Sassy Liberty's No Consent From the Governed on Tuesday, February 21, 2017

Just to review the word of the day is TREASON. Strictly defined that means – the crime of betraying one’s country, especially by attempting to kill the sovereign or overthrow the government. Synonmous with words like treachery, disloyalty, betrayal, faithlessness.

Treason is selling Putin our uranium.

Treason is purchasing a fraudulent Dossier which was connected to the Kremlin.

Treason is giving billions of dollars to Iran.

Putin from the Summit – “I was an intelligence officer myself, and I know how dossiers are made up,” suggesting the Steele dossier was fake.

Got that? Good! Glad we cleared that up…

Join the conversation

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.


Dem Candidate Pushing ‘Irresponsible Breeder’ Tax On Certain Parents Because Of ‘Privilege’



Scott Wallace is a multimillionaire running in Pennsylvania’s 1st Congressional District against current incumbent Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (PA-R). Considered an elite, even amongst the wealthy, he boasts a net worth of between $127 million and $309 million, according to his financial disclosure statement. This would make him the third-richest member of Congress if he were elected to the House today.

From a hardline leftist pedigree, his grandfather was Henry Wallace, the “New Deal visionary” and one-time vice president under former President Franklin D. Roosevelt. His wealth is inherited, stemming from a seed company his grandfather founded that was purchased by DuPont for $10 billion in the 1990s, along with a large number of stocks with the largest being DowDuPont.

His campaign is largely self funded with Wallace claiming he is “putting a significant amount of my own assets into this because this is the most important thing I can imagine doing for America at this point in my life — this is a very expensive district to run in, but it is crucial in the Democrats’ efforts to retake the House.”

But just why this is so incredibly important to Wallace goes beyond the typical party lines of Republican and Democrat. Receiving endorsements from both Planned Parenthood and the National Organization for Women (NOW), Wallace is a population control zealot who believes families who choose to have more than two children are “irresponsible breeders” and should be taxed. Wallace has donated nearly $7 million dollars to various population control groups over the past 20 years, with the majority going through his own Wallace Global Fund.  In addition to its efforts towards population control, the foundation has also reportedly donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to anti-Israel groups that support a boycott of the Jewish State.

Fox News reports:

“Zero Population Growth (ZPG) was among the organizations that received the money from the fund. According to public records, it received $420,000 between 1997 and 2003.

The group, shortly after being founded in 1968, released a brochure advocating abortion to stabilize population growth and claimed that “no responsible family should have more than two children.” To deal with larger families, it also called for families to be “taxed to the hilt” for “irresponsible breeding.”

It also blamed the overpopulation on the ‘white middle-class’ that ‘use up more than their share of resources and do more than their share of polluting‘ and urged them to ‘voluntarily limit their families to two children.’

Paul Ehrlich, who co-founded the ZPG, once called abortion “a highly effective weapon in the armory of population control.” The goal of the organization, which changed its name to Population Connection in 2002, has remained the same since its inception, arguing that the world needs to contain population growth with particular emphasis on American families.

The organization’s political arm, Population Connection Action Fund, publicly endorsed Wallace for Congress, saying his support for their cause is “exactly the kind of dedication we need in Congress.”

Wallace’s fund also gave $20,000 in 2010 to the Center for the Advancement of the Steady State Economy (CASSE), a group that sees the economic growth as undesirable and instead supports an economy with ‘stable or mildly fluctuating levels’ and a society where birth rates equal death rates.

The organization openly supports zero population growth and its executive board member, Herman Daly, advocated issuing reproduction licenses, allowing women to have only two children unless they buy the license for more children from other women. Daly called it the ‘best plan yet offered’ to limit population growth.”

The group advocates strongly for abortion and along with taxing families “to the hilt” for having more than two children, as noted in a Yale Law School publication about the “voices that shaped the abortion debate before the Roe v. Wade Supreme Court’s ruling.”

The group advocates that –

  1. That no responsible family should have more than two children. Any family wanting to care for more than two children should adopt further children. Adopting children does not increase the population.
  2. All methods of birth control, including legalized abortion, should be freely available—and at no cost in poverty cases.
  3. Irresponsible people who have more than two children should be taxed to the hilt for the privilege of irresponsible breeding.

Fox News continued:

Zoe Wilson-Meyer, communications director for Wallace’s campaign, didn’t answer Fox News’ questions on whether Wallace still supports the ideas expressed by the groups.

“The Wallace Global Fund has for decades been a leader in helping women gain access to family planning. Former Co-Chair Scott Wallace is proud of the work of grantees like Planned Parenthood in empowering women and protecting reproductive rights and will stand up for Pennsylvania women,” she said in an email.

“In Washington, Brian Fitzpatrick voted to defund Planned Parenthood and supports Donald Trump’s effort to take away a woman’s right to choose,” she added.

Largely reminiscent of Nazi Germany who exercised eugenics to its full and most horrific potential, this policy of so-called “irresponsible breeders” also resembles the one-child policy from China that saw forced abortions or other forced invasive birth control procedures. Yet eugenics practices had their roots in America as well. American newspapers frequently offered praise for eugenics just prior to WWII and The Holocaust …. that is until Adolf Hitler revealed the true horrors of what eugenics really looked like. They avoided the subject for decades thereafter.

Nine out of ten eugenicists in the 20th Century were also Progressives or Socialists, and the most central component to the eugenic creed is the desire to engineer and centrally plan human reproduction, weeding out the unwanted or undesirable, according to a report on eugenics by PBS.

Yet where does that end? Who determines who is undesirable? Is it the unborn child conceived at an inconvenient time? The elderly mother? The child with cerebral palsy? Those with PTSD? Autism? Blue eyes? White skin? You cannot get to genocide without first visiting identity politics and they say the propagandist’s job is to effectively make the people forget his “enemy” is, in fact, a human being just as he is. It seems we never really do learn from history, do we?

Continue Reading


Trump Issued Major Warning: ‘We Will Look Into Discriminatory and Illegal Practice’ – It’s On!

Huge problems and everyone needs to know!



President Donald Trump voiced his concerns over “discriminatory and illegal practice” when he posted about the alleged controversy going on with Republicans being censored on Twitter. The tactic is sometimes referred to as “shadow banning” and it seems to be a strategy that social media platforms use to limit the visibility of some people. For example, ever wonder why someone who is genuinely popular might have tons of followers but their posts don’t seem to get many responses? It could be one of several reasons. Either they have fake followers, the post is no good, or they are being censored. In many cases, it’s a form of censorship that’s the obvious result. When a social media user goes from getting a lot of replies and views on their posts, then all of a sudden there’s very little replies and it seems like no one has seen the post – then they were hit with that form of censorship or suppression.

Social media platforms such as Twitter and Facebook have been called out for suppressing the content of certain Republican voices or those who support President Donald Trump. Well-known stars like Diamond and Silk have made it very public that they feel targeted for the views and opinions on their pages. That’s just the tip of the iceberg because the problem spans from targeting well-known mainstream people all the way down to the independent publishers. Censorship like this is affecting people’s careers and causing an unbalanced platform in which people with certain views are being limited. It might not be listed as a “ban” but it’s certainly limiting the viewership of certain people. The content that would once appear in people’s feed or timeline now requires a fine-tooth comb to find and it seems like people are realizing this more often and being upset with it.

Trump spoke about it on Twitter and Vice News completed a report on it.

Vice News reported: “Twitter is limiting the visibility of prominent Republicans in search results — a technique known as “shadow banning” — in what it says is a side effect of its attempts to improve the quality of discourse on the platform.

The Republican Party chair Ronna McDaniel, several conservative Republican congressmen, and Donald Trump Jr.’s spokesman no longer appear in the auto-populated drop-down search box on Twitter, VICE News has learned. It’s a shift that diminishes their reach on the platform — and it’s the same one being deployed against prominent racists to limit their visibility. The profiles continue to appear when conducting a full search, but not in the more convenient and visible drop-down bar. (The accounts appear to also populate if you already follow the person.)

Democrats are not being “shadow banned” in the same way, according to a VICE News review. McDaniel’s counterpart, Democratic Party chair Tom Perez, and liberal members of Congress — including Reps. Maxine Waters, Joe Kennedy III, Keith Ellison, and Mark Pocan — all continue to appear in drop-down search results. Not a single member of the 78-person Progressive Caucus faces the same situation in Twitter’s search.

“The notion that social media companies would suppress certain political points of view should concern every American,” McDaniel told VICE News in a statement. “Twitter owes the public answers to what’s really going on.”

Presented with screenshots of the searches, a Twitter spokesperson told VICE News: “We are aware that some accounts are not automatically populating in our search box and shipping a change to address this.” Asked why only conservative Republicans appear to be affected and not liberal Democrats, the spokesperson wrote: “I’d emphasize that our technology is based on account *behavior* not the content of Tweets.”

Twitter directed VICE News to a May 15 blog post that explained the company’s new approach to combating “troll-like behaviors.” After making changes to its platform, the company said that “[t]he result is that people contributing to the healthy conversation will be more visible in conversations and search.”

Twitter did not respond to a follow-up question.

Twitter’s troll hunt, however, has ensnared some of the most prominent Republicans in the country. Type in the names of McDaniel, conservative members of Congress like Reps. Mark Meadows, Jim Jordan, and Matt Gaetz, and Trump Jr.’s spokesman Andrew Surabian, for example, and Twitter’s drop-down search bar does not show their profiles. The search menu also does not display the verified profile of Rep. Devin Nunes of California, only his unverified one that he seldom uses to post.

That limits their visibility and the ease of finding their profiles compared to their liberal counterparts.

UPDATE: July 26, 10:00 AM: Twitter appears to have adjusted its platform overnight to no longer limit the visibility of some prominent Republicans in its search results.”

At what point do social media platforms give the control back to the people? Users should not have to worry about their views being censored by the machine.

Censoring any content that is not illegal should not be tolerated by the users.

Continue Reading

Like Us on Facebook



No trending posts found at this time.